Crawford v. State, 43172
| Decision Date | 10 June 1986 |
| Docket Number | No. 43172,43172 |
| Citation | 344 S.E.2d 215,256 Ga. 57 |
| Parties | CRAWFORD v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
August F. Siemon III, Atlanta, for Eddie Crawford.
Johnnie L. Caldwell, Dist. Atty., Griffin, J. David Fowler, Paschal A. English, Jr., Asst. Dist. Attys., for the State.
Eddie Albert Crawford was convicted of the murder of his 29-month old niece, Leslie Michelle English, and sentenced to death. We reversed the conviction on grounds relating to the form of the verdict. Crawford v. State, 254 Ga. 435, 439(1), 330 S.E.2d 567 (1985). Before a second trial, Crawford filed a pre-trial motion to enjoin the state from seeking again the death penalty. The trial court denied his motion and Crawford appeals.
1. Crawford contends that principles of double jeopardy, as applied to resentencing, prohibit the state from seeking the death penalty on retrial. He relies on Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981), for the proposition that a reversal of a conviction in which the death penalty has been imposed is equivalent to an acquittal. Here, the jury found "kidnapping" as the sole aggravating circumstance at Crawford's trial. Kidnapping alone is not a statutory aggravating circumstance. OCGA §§ 16-5-40(b), 17-10-30(b)(2). Crawford, supra, 254 Ga. at 440(5), 330 S.E.2d 567. Crawford maintains that the jury thus "acquitted" him of the aggravating circumstances of kidnapping with bodily injury and of any other possible aggravating circumstance.
In Poland v. Arizona, 476 U.S. 147, 106 S.Ct. 1749, 89 L.Ed.2d --- (1986), the United States Supreme Court held that a reversal of a conviction in which the death penalty was imposed does not preclude imposing the death penalty upon a retrial unless the sentencer or reviewing court has found that the evidence is insufficient to support the death penalty. The jury here was charged relative to the alleged aggravating circumstances of rape, kidnapping, and kidnapping with bodily injury. The jury imposed the sentence of death, specifying "kidnapping" as the aggravating circumstance.
2. There has been no finding that the evidence is insufficient to support the death penalty. Indeed, the evidence in the case is amply sufficient to warrant capital punishment. Accordingly, the state is not prohibited from seeking anew the death penalty. Upon retrial, the state may introduce evidence of kidnapping with bodily injury, and of any other aggravating circumstances,...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Pope v. State
...insufficient to establish the presence of this statutory aggravating circumstance. We agree. anew" the death penalty, Crawford v. State, 256 Ga. 57, 344 S.E.2d 215 (1986), the state may attempt to respond properly to defendant's This statutory aggravating circumstance has two components, bo......
-
Griffin v. State, S95A1093
...circumstances, the State may introduce evidence of aggravating circumstances not presented to the first jury. Crawford v. State, 256 Ga. 57(2), 344 S.E.2d 215 (1986); Spraggins v. State, 255 Ga. 195, 336 S.E.2d 227 (1985). In keeping with our prior decisions, we decline to hold that the Sta......
-
Moore v. State, S92P1144
...aggravating circumstances found by the jury, OCGA § 17-10-35(c)(2), the State may again seek a death sentence. Crawford v. State, 256 Ga. 57, 344 S.E.2d 215 (1986). Judgment of conviction affirmed. Sentence vacated and case remanded for CLARKE, C.J., HUNT, P.J., and FLETCHER, SEARS-COLLINS ......
-
Crawford v. State
...appeal, we affirmed, holding that the state was not prohibited for any reason from "seeking anew the death penalty." Crawford v. State, 256 Ga. 57, 58, 344 S.E.2d 215 (1986). The case then proceeded to trial, and the defendant was convicted of murder and sentenced to death. The facts are se......