Crebbin v. Shinn
Decision Date | 14 December 1903 |
Citation | 74 P. 795,19 Colo.App. 302 |
Parties | CREBBIN v. SHINN et al. |
Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Montrose County.
Action by Alfred Crebbin against E.E. Shinn and another. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Samuel G. McMullin, for appellant.
F.D Catlin, for appellees.
A general demurrer to the complaint was sustained, and, plaintiff electing to stand by his complaint a judgment of dismissal was entered. By virtue of 1 Mills' Ann.St. § 680, costs follow a judgment upon a demurrer. Appellee contends that this case is not appealable because there is no judgment, except for costs, against appellant. This court has held that appeals lie to this court in all civil cases, regardless of the amount of the judgment subject only to the limitation that the judgment is the final judgment of a court of record. Livermore v. Truesdell, 7 Colo.App. 470, 43 P. 663. It is also contended that, because it does not appear from the abstract of record that a bill of exceptions was filed, the judgment cannot be reviewed. Decisions of courts of record sustaining or overruling demurrers are a part of the record proper, and are reviewable by the appellate courts without a bill of exceptions. Mills' Ann.Code, § 387.
The complaint avers that July 2, 1888, Robert L. Shinn, by a promissory note of that date, agreed to pay, five years thereafter, $900, to the Jarvis-Conklin Mortgage Trust Company, with interest at 7 per cent., payable semiannually. To secure payment of the note, he executed a deed of trust, ordinary form, to Samuel M. Davis, trustee, upon certain lands in Delta county owned by him. February 21, 1890, by a quitclaim deed, for the expressed consideration of $1 he conveyed the land to E.E. Shinn, one of the appellees. Thereafter E.E. Shinn paid interest on the note to the Jarvis-Conklin Mortgage Trust Company to July 1, 1893, when E.E. Shinn and his wife, Nettie Shinn, appellees herein, executed the following writing:
"Nettie Shinn." Thereafter the note, trust deed, extension agreement, and interest coupons attached to the extension agreement were assigned to Crebbin, appellant, who is the owner and holder thereof. The appellees paid the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bayou Land Co. v. Talley
...the Blums' formal consent. Thus, the parties acted as if Bayou Gulch had assumed the note. Bayou Gulch, relying on Crebbin v. Shinn, 19 Colo.App. 302, 74 P. 795 (1903), claims that execution of an extension agreement does not constitute an assumption of the underlying debt. Although we agre......
-
State ex rel. Walker v. Board of Com'rs of Flathead County
... ... properly incorporated in the judgment roll. Analogous cases ... from other jurisdictions are: Crebbin v. Shinn, 19 ... Colo.App. 302, 74 P. 795; Taylor v. McCormick, 7 ... Idaho 524, 64 P. 239; Turner Real Estate Co. v ... Anson, 22 Wyo. 383, 142 ... ...
-
Hulin v. Veatch
... ... Ray v. Lobdell, ... 213 Ill. 389 [72 N.E. 1076]; Scholten v. Barber, 217 Ill. 148 ... [75 N.E. 460]." To like effect, see Crebbin v ... Shinn, 19 Colo. App. 302, 74 P. 795 ... From Holcomb v. Thompson, 50 Kan. 598, 32 P. 1091, ... we ... ...
-
Elliott v. Denver Joint Stock Land Bank of Denver
... ... than the one entered into between Nixon and defendant, as ... disclosed by the record. Crebbin v. Shinn, 19 ... Colo.App. 302, 74 P. 795. Nixon and defendant never entered ... into any agreement for an exchange, sale or purchase of any ... ...