Cummings v. Browne
Decision Date | 15 June 1883 |
Citation | 16 N.W. 280,61 Iowa 385 |
Parties | CUMMINGS ET AL. v. BROWNE |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court.
ACTION to quiet the title of certain lands. The defendant by his answer and a cross bill set up title to the land claimed by plaintiffs. There was a decree quieting the title of a part of the land in plaintiffs, and the title of the other part in defendants. Plaintiffs appeal.
REVERSED.
E. E Hosner, for appellants.
C. E Ransier, for appellee.
I.
The plaintiffs are the heirs at law of C. W. Cummings, who died seized of blocks 9, 10, 11, and 12 of Cummings' Addition to the city of Independence, and the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of section thirty-five, township eighty-nine, range nine, west. The lands lie adjacent, as will appear from the plat which will hereafter be produced. Plaintiffs claim title to the lands through their father, C. W. Cummings. The defendant, in his answer and cross-bill, claims title to the lands under conveyances made by Cummings and his grantees, all sufficiently set out in the agreed statement of facts, which we find necessary for a clear understanding of the case to reproduce in this opinion. The claim of defendant probably covers only the land laid off into city lots. He alleges that it was the intention of the parties to these deeds to convey all the lands claimed by him. He also claims the lands under a tax title. The facts and proceedings upon which it is based are set out in the agreed statement of facts. defendant further relies upon payment of taxes and the possession of the land, which, under the statute of limitations, will bar plaintiffs' action.
The cause was submitted for trial upon the following agreed statement of facts, admission of record, and other evidence.
In addition to the agreed statement of facts, it was also admitted of record that Barnes Gilbert, during his lifetime, was a resident of Vermont, and never lived in the state of Iowa, and that he died in 1868.
There was evidence showing that Barnes Gilbert paid the taxes in controversy from 1858 to 1874, and that Browne paid the taxes subsequent to the sale under which he claims. At the close of the evidence, the defendant entered a disclaimer of interest or title in...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
In re Estate of Orwig
... ... will suffice." ... See, ... also, as laying down the same rule, Marshall v ... McLean, 3 G. Greene 363, and Cummings v ... Browne, 61 Iowa 385, 16 N.W. 280. The italicized words ... are merely by way of explanation or reference, and as such, ... do not impair ... ...
-
In re Orwig's Estate
...certainty, that will suffice. See, also, as laying down the same rule, Marshall v. McLean, 3 G. Greene, 363, and Cummings v. Browne, 61 Iowa, 385, 16 N. W. 280. The italicized words are merely by way of explanation or reference and as such do not impair or destroy the specific grant precedi......
-
Patterson v. May
...the antecedent estate, or, as in the instant case, of making redemption from a tax sale already made. The defendant in Cummings v. Browne, 61 Iowa 385, 16 N.W. 280, confronted by the identical dilemma that faced defendant May here (Iowa citation page 391, 16 N.W. 283). He attempted to avoid......
-
Beardsley v. Nashville
...102. The deed of Skillern was improperly admitted in evidence. 9 Cranch, 173; 5 How. 187, 193; 3 Ark. 18, 57; 6 Wheat. 581; 13 Otto, 316; 61 Iowa 385. Plaintiff, under the evidence, was entitled recover the rental value of the land, nominal damages at least, and his costs. 14 Ark. 421, 431;......