Cummings v. Warden, Md. House of Correction

Decision Date27 July 1966
Docket NumberNo. 133,133
Citation243 Md. 702,221 A.2d 908
PartiesRobert CUMMINGS (Alias Roy Tucker) v. WARDEN, MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTION. Post Conviction
CourtMaryland Court of Appeals

Before PRESCOTT, C. J., and HAMMOND, HORNEY, MARBURY, OPPENHEIMER, BARNES and McWILLIAMS, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

Application for leave to appeal from a denial of post conviction relief is denied for the reasons set out in the opinion of Judge Byrnes in the court below. While Judge Byrnes reasonably concluded that petitioner did in fact knowingly waive the right to be represented at his trial by court-appointed counsel, it appears that petitioner also contends that it is constitutionally impossible to waive this right. This point was settle in Ware v. State, 235 Md. 131, 200 A.2d 664, which held that Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335, 83 S.Ct. 792, 9 L.Ed.2d 799, did not change the long-standing rule that an accused has a right to proceed without counsel following a knowing and intelligent waiver. The principle remains unaffected by the more recent Supreme Court cases dealing with right to counsel and self-incrimination.

Application denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Smith v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • September 1, 1986
    ...Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806, 95 S.Ct. 2525, 45 L.Ed.2d 562 (1975); Leonard, 302 Md. at 119, 486 A.2d 163; Cummings v. Warden, 243 Md. 702, 703, 221 A.2d 908 (1965); Hamilton v. State, 30 Md.App. 202, 205, 351 A.2d 153 (1975). When a defendant indicates that he wishes to defend pro s......
  • Montgomery v. Warden, Md. House of Correction
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • February 21, 1967
    ...manner that there was no denial of due process. It is constitutionally possible to waive the right to be represented. Cummings, etc. v. Warden, 243 Md. 702, 221 A.2d 908; citing Ware v. State, 235 Md. 131, 200 A.2d The Supreme Court set forth the criteria of waiver in Carnley v. Cochran, 36......
  • Brown v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • July 25, 1968
    ...proceed without counsel following a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to counsel is likewise well settled. See Cummings v. Warden, 243 Md. 702, 221 A.2d 908; Ware v. State, 235 Md. 131, 200 A.2d 664. The classic definition of waiver of a federal constitutional right is that contai......
  • Wayne v. State
    • United States
    • Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
    • June 21, 1968
    ...an accused has a right to proceed without counsel following a knowing and intelligent waiver of his right to counsel. Cummings v. Warden, 243 Md. 702, 221 A.2d 908; Ware v. State, 235 Md. 131, 200 A.2d 664; Montgomery v. Warden, supra. The classic definition of waiver of a federal constitut......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT