Cutler v. Harrison, 3D00-755.
| Decision Date | 25 July 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. 3D00-755.,3D00-755. |
| Citation | 792 So.2d 574 |
| Parties | Ronald CUTLER, Appellant, v. Shelton HARRISON and Shelton Harrison Chevrolet, Inc., a dissolved Tennessee corporation, Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Robert N. Reynolds, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Aran Correa & Guarch, Coral Gables, and Joseph A. Miles, for appellees.
Before COPE, GERSTEN and RAMIREZ, JJ.
Ronald Cutler appeals an order dismissing his lawsuit collaterally attacking a Tennessee judgment which has been domesticated in Florida. We affirm.
In 1997 there was litigation between these parties in which appellees Shelton Harrison and Shelton Harrison Chevrolet, Inc. ("Harrison") sought to domesticate a Tennessee money judgment against appellant Ronald Cutler. Cutler opposed that relief on procedural and substantive grounds. The court entered an order that the judgment be domesticated, thereby necessarily overruling Cutler's defenses.
In 1999 Cutler filed an action for declaratory judgment, seeking to collaterally attack the Tennessee judgment. Cutler raised essentially the same arguments that he raised in the 1997 action. We agree with the trial court that the earlier proceeding was res judicata.
We agree with Cutler that the procedure followed in the 1997 action varied from that which is contemplated by the Florida Enforcement Foreign Judgments Act, §§ 55.501-.509, Fla. Stat. (1997). That statute contemplates that Harrison as judgment creditor would file the judgment in Florida, without the necessity of filing a lawsuit, see id. § 55.503, and any litigation over the validity of the judgment would be initiated by Cutler as judgment debtor. See id. §§ 55.505, .509; Hinchee v. Golden Oak Bank, 540 So.2d 262, 263 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); The Florida Bar, Creditors' and Debtors' Practice in Florida § 5.10a (1997). Although it was unnecessary, Harrison proceeded by civil action to request domestication of the judgment. The trial court overruled the objections offered by defendant-appellant Cutler, and ordered that the judgment be domesticated. There was no appeal. We concur with the trial court that the res judicata doctrine bars the present action.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
645 W. 44th St. Assocs. v. Koch
...under the Florida Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act, there would be no need to have even filed this lawsuit. See Cutler v. Harrison, 792 So. 2d 574, 575 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001) (explaining that the Florida Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Act contemplates that a judgment creditor file the jud......
-
Haigh v. Planning Bd. of Town of Medfield, 5D05-2809.
...raising the same grounds raised in the prior litigation. The trial court dismissed the debtor's action on the ground of res judicata. The Cutler court affirmed, finding that although the original suit was not necessary, it had proceeded forward and was not appealed. Thus, res judicata barre......