Cyprus Emerald Corp v. Fed. Mine Safety & Health Comm'n, Nos. 98-1442 and 98-1548

CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
Writing for the CourtKaren LeCraft Henderson; Randolph
Citation195 F.3d 42
Parties(D.C. Cir. 1999) Cyprus Emerald Resources Corporation, Petitioner v. Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission and Secretary of Labor, Respondents
Docket NumberNos. 98-1442 and 98-1548
Decision Date05 November 1999
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
11 practice notes
  • Trans Union LLC v. F.T.C., No. 01-5202.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • July 16, 2002
    ...Council v. EPA, 292 F.3d 232, 234 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Cyprus Emerald Resources Corp. v. Fed. Mine Safety & Health Review Comm'n, 195 F.3d 42, 45 (D.C.Cir.1999)). To the extent that the statutory term "financial institution" may be ambiguous, we believe the FTC reasonably construed the t......
  • Kimberlin v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, No. 01-5387.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • February 11, 2003
    ...Council v. EPA, 292 F.3d 232, 234 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Cyprus Emerald Resources Corp. v. Fed. Mine Safety & Health Review Comm'n, 195 F.3d 42, 45 (D.C.Cir.1999)). We conclude the BOP's absolute ban on electric and electronic musical instruments reflects, at a minimum, a reasonable interp......
  • Beverly Health & Rehab. Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., No. 01-1405.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • January 31, 2003
    ...v. U.S. E.P.A., 292 F.3d 232, 234 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Cyprus Emerald Resources Corp. v. Fed. Mine Safety & Health Review Comm'n, 195 F.3d 42, 45 (D.C.Cir.1999)). We conclude section 8(g) manifests an "unambiguously expressed intent" that precludes the Board's Section 8(g) expressly stat......
  • Wolf Run Mining Co. v. Fed. Mine Safety, No. 10–1392.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • November 4, 2011
    ...and substantial’ under section 104(d)(1) can have significant consequences to a mine operator.” Cyprus Emerald Res. Corp. v. FMSHRC, 195 F.3d 42, 43 & n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1999). For instance, the minimum penalty for a citation involving a “significant and substantial” violation issued under secti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
  • Trans Union LLC v. F.T.C., No. 01-5202.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • July 16, 2002
    ...Council v. EPA, 292 F.3d 232, 234 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Cyprus Emerald Resources Corp. v. Fed. Mine Safety & Health Review Comm'n, 195 F.3d 42, 45 (D.C.Cir.1999)). To the extent that the statutory term "financial institution" may be ambiguous, we believe the FTC reasonably construed the t......
  • Kimberlin v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, No. 01-5387.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • February 11, 2003
    ...Council v. EPA, 292 F.3d 232, 234 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Cyprus Emerald Resources Corp. v. Fed. Mine Safety & Health Review Comm'n, 195 F.3d 42, 45 (D.C.Cir.1999)). We conclude the BOP's absolute ban on electric and electronic musical instruments reflects, at a minimum, a reasonable interp......
  • Beverly Health & Rehab. Services, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., No. 01-1405.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • January 31, 2003
    ...v. U.S. E.P.A., 292 F.3d 232, 234 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Cyprus Emerald Resources Corp. v. Fed. Mine Safety & Health Review Comm'n, 195 F.3d 42, 45 (D.C.Cir.1999)). We conclude section 8(g) manifests an "unambiguously expressed intent" that precludes the Board's Section 8(g) expressly stat......
  • Wolf Run Mining Co. v. Fed. Mine Safety, No. 10–1392.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • November 4, 2011
    ...and substantial’ under section 104(d)(1) can have significant consequences to a mine operator.” Cyprus Emerald Res. Corp. v. FMSHRC, 195 F.3d 42, 43 & n. 1 (D.C.Cir.1999). For instance, the minimum penalty for a citation involving a “significant and substantial” violation issued under secti......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT