D. A. Schulte, Inc., v. Hewitt Grocery Co.

Decision Date30 June 1924
Citation101 Conn. 750,125 A. 365
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesD. A. SCHULTE, INC., v. HEWITT GROCERY CO. ET AL.

Appeal from District Court of Waterbury; Frederick M. Peasley, Judge.

Action by D. A. Schulte, Inc., against the Hewitt Grocery Company and others. From granting of defendants' motion to set aside verdict, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

William T. Keavney, Jr., and John H. Cassidy, both of Waterbury, for appellant.

Walter E. Monagan, of Waterbury, for appellees.

PER CURIAM.

In setting aside a verdict the trial judge is acting in the exercise of a legal discretion, and his action will not be disturbed by us, unless it clearly appears that the discretion was abused; and in passing upon the question of abuse great weight should be given to his opinion, and every assumption made in favor of its correctness. Robinson v. Backes, 91 Conn. 460, 99 A. 1057; Roma v. Thames River S. Co., 90 Conn. 18, 96 A. 169.

A careful examination of the evidence presented on the trial discloses that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ruling, in substance, that the jury could not reasonably have found the issues presented to them by the pleadings in favor of the plaintiff.

There is no error.

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 cases
  • Amellin v. Leone
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 8 Marzo 1932
    ... ... 41; Canfield v. Sheketoff, 104 Conn. 28, 30, ... 132 A. 401; Schulte, Inc., v. Hewitt Grocery Co., ... 101 Conn. 750, 751, 125 A. 365; Skaling ... ...
  • Lahunta v. City Of Waterbury.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 3 Junio 1948
    ...but of the following. A trial court's decision in this connection is ordinarily entitled to great weight, D. A. Schulte, Inc., v. Hewitt Grocery Co., 101 Conn. 750, 751, 125 A. 365; Delmore v. Polinsky, 132 Conn. 28, 29, 42 A.2d 349; but it is the plaintiff's constitutional right ‘to have i......
  • Atchison v. Lewis.
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 20 Julio 1944
    ...v. Danforth, 124 Conn. 468, 469, 200 A. 577; Knight-Realty Co., Inc., v. Caserta, 126 Conn. 162, 10 A.2d 597; Schulte, Inc., v. Hewitt Grocery Co., 101 Conn. 750, 751, 125 A. 365. The test of testamentary capacity stated in its simplest terms is that the testator must have mind and memory s......
  • Maroncelli v. Starkweather
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • 7 Mayo 1926
    ... ... discretion and set aside a verdict? In Schulte, Inc., v ... Hewitt Grocery Co., 101 Conn. 750, 125 A. 365, we state ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT