Danville Plywood Corp. v. Plain & Fancy Kitchens, Inc., 761234

Decision Date23 November 1977
Docket NumberNo. 761234,761234
Citation218 Va. 533,238 S.E.2d 800
CourtVirginia Supreme Court
Parties, 23 UCC Rep.Serv. 30 DANVILLE PLYWOOD CORPORATION v. PLAIN AND FANCY KITCHENS, INC. Record

Gary L. Bengston, Danville, for plaintiff in error.

Before CARRICO, HARRISON, COCHRAN, HARMAN, POFF and COMPTON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

By this appeal Danville Plywood Corporation (Plywood) seeks to reverse the trial court's dismissal on jurisdictional grounds of its contract action for $5,844.35 against Plain and Fancy Kitchens, Inc. (Kitchens). The specific question presented is whether the trial court erred in holding Kitchens not subject to its jurisdiction under the provision of Virginia's "long arm statute" which grants our courts personal jurisdiction over a party "as to a cause of action arising from the (party's) . . . (t)ransacting any business in this State." Code § 8-81.2(a)(1). *

The facts are not in dispute. Plywood, a Virginia corporation, operates a plant in Danville, Virginia, which manufactures plywood panels. Kitchens uses plywood panels in fabricating kitchen cabinets at its plant in Richland, Pennsylvania. Kitchens, a foreign corporation, is not domesticated in Virginia. It has never sold or offered to sell its products in Virginia. The officers and directors of Kitchens are not, nor have they ever been, residents of or domiciled in this jurisdiction.

On September 28, 1975, Gordon Herron, a salesman employed by several manufacturers, including Plywood, called on Kitchens at its plant in Pennsylvania. As the result of Herron's solicitation, Kitchens placed an order with Plywood for more than 500 plywood panels to be shipped, F. O. B. Danville, to Kitchens. On November 7, 1975, Plywood delivered the panels to a common carrier which, in due course, delivered them to Kitchens' plant in Pennsylvania. On the same date Plywood billed Kitchens for the panels in the amount of $5,844.35. When Kitchens declined to pay this bill, alleging that some of the panels shipped to it were defective, Plywood instituted this action in Virginia.

The purpose of our "long arm statute" is to assert jurisdiction, to the extent permissible under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution of the United States, over nonresidents who engage in some purposeful activity in Virginia. Carmichael v. Snyder, 209 Va. 451, 456, 164 S.E.2d 703, 707 (1968). And a single act by a nonresident which amounts to "transacting business" in Virginia and gives rise to a cause of action may be sufficient to confer jurisdiction upon our courts. Kolbe, Inc. v. Chromodern, Inc., 211 Va. 736, 740, 180 S.E.2d 664, 667 (1971). Due process requires, however, that a nonresident have "certain minimum contacts" within the territory of the forum so that the maintenance of the action does not offend "traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice." International Shoe Co. v. Washington, 326 U.S. 310, 316, ...

To continue reading

Request your trial
65 cases
  • Davis v. Costa-Gavras
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • 7 Febrero 1984
    ...act does not confer jurisdiction if it can only technically be said to have transpired in Virginia. Danville Plywood Corp. v. Plain & Fancy Kitchens Inc., 218 Va. 533, 238 S.E.2d 800 (1977). Plaintiffs do not argue for application of paragraph four of the Virginia longarm statute, which aut......
  • Touchcom, Inc. v. Bereskin & Parr
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Federal Circuit
    • 3 Agosto 2009
    ...authorize the exercise of jurisdiction to the full extent permitted by the U.S. Constitution. Danville Plywood Corp. v. Plain & Fancy Kitchens, Inc., 218 Va. 533, 238 S.E.2d 800, 802 (1977). Thus, satisfaction of Virginia's requirements for service of process is satisfied when due process i......
  • Prototype Prods., Inc. v. Reset, Inc., Civil Action No. 2:11cv196.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • 5 Enero 2012
    ...of the United States, over nonresidents who engage in some purposeful activity in Virginia.” Danville Plywood Corp. v. Plain & Fancy Kitchens, Inc., 218 Va. 533, 238 S.E.2d 800, 802 (1977). Because Virginia's Supreme Court has held that its long-arm statute is generally coextensive with the......
  • In re Chinese Manufactured Drywall Prods. Liab. Litig.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • 4 Septiembre 2012
    ...of the United States, over nonresidents who engage in some purposeful activity in Virginia.” Danville Plywood Corp. v. Plain & Fancy Kitchens, Inc., 218 Va. 533, 534, 238 S.E.2d 800 (1977)(citing Carmichael v. Snyder, 209 Va. 451, 456, 164 S.E.2d 703 (1968)); Caldwell v. Seaboard S.R., Inc.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT