Davis v. Duncan, 1782.
Decision Date | 07 January 1937 |
Docket Number | No. 1782.,1782. |
Citation | 102 S.W.2d 287 |
Parties | DAVIS et al. v. DUNCAN et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Leon County; S. W. Dean, Judge.
Trespass to try title by William Hardwick Davis and others against Mrs. Eddie House Duncan and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs appeal.
Affirmed.
Harris & Coltzer, Brantly Harris, Stewarts, Maco Stewart, and W. Noble Carl, all of Galveston, Jerome Sneed, Jr., of Austin, and R. H. Whilden, of Houston, for appellants.
Dickson & Huck, Laurie M. Huck, and Hicks, Dickson & Lange, all of San Antonio, Seale & Seale, of Centerville, and M. S. Church and W. F. Bane, both of Dallas, for appellees.
This action was brought by William Hardwick Davis and others against Mrs. Eddie House Duncan and others in trespass to try title to recover 320 acres of land in Leon county. At the conclusion of the evidence the court instructed a verdict for defendants. Plaintiffs appealed.
The land in question was deeded to Alf Davis in 1869, at a time when he and Julia H. Davis were husband and wife. In 1874, Alf Davis, without the joinder of his wife, executed and delivered to Mrs. L. L. House the following instrument:
Appellees claims as heirs and grantees under Mrs. L. L. House. They and those under whom they claim have been paying taxes on the land for approximately fifty years, but it does not appear that they have had such possession as to entitle them to hold the land by limitation. Therefore, they must depend on the title acquired under the above deed. Appellants claim as heirs of Mrs. Julia H. Davis, now deceased. It is their contention that said land was in fact the separate property of Mrs. Julia H. Davis and therefore not subject to conveyance by Alf Davis alone. Appellants introduced in evidence a certified copy of a deed of trust executed by Alf Davis and wife, Julia H. Davis, to Orr & Lindsey in 1874, and recorded in Leon county in the same year, to secure the payment of a debt owing by the firm of Davis, Cain & Co., of which Alf Davis was a member, covering the land here involved, which deed of trust, immediately following the description of the land, contained the statement: "The same lands being the private property of Julia H. Davis." Said deed of trust does not constitute a link in the chain of title, and the recitations therein are material only as declarations against interest. Appellants contend that the above-quoted recitation contained in said deed of trust was sufficient to raise a question of fact for the jury as to whether said land was the separate property of Julia H. Davis. After very careful consideration, we have reached the conclusion that this contention cannot be sustained.
The land was admittedly acquired during the marriage of Alf Davis and wife, and under the statutes of this state it is presumed to have been...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Edsall v. Edsall
...258; Lindemood et al. v. Evans, Tex.Civ.App., 166 S.W.2d 774 (Writ Ref.); Gibson v. Gibson, Tex.Civ.App., 202 S.W.2d 288; Davis v. Duncan, Tex.Civ.App., 102 S.W.2d 287; Epperson et al. v. Jones et al., 65 Tex. 425; Hardee, Sheriff, v. Vincent, 136 Tex. 99, 147 S.W.2d The status of property ......
-
Duncan v. Duncan
...280; Harkness v. McQueen, Tex.Civ.App., 232 S.W.2d 629; Lindemood v. Evans, Tex.Civ.App., 166 S.W.2d 774; Davis v. Duncan, Tex.Civ.App., 102 S.W.2d 287, (Dis. W.O.J.); Skinner v. Skinner, Tex.Civ.App., 202 S.W.2d 318; Brick & Tile, Inc., v. Parker, 143 Tex. 383, ,186 S.W.2d Since the decisi......
-
Miller v. Miller
...identified." This announcement of the law is followed in Mayor v. Breeding et al., Tex.Civ.App., 24 S.W.2d 542; Davis et al. v. Duncan et al., Tex.Civ.App., 102 S.W.2d 287. The decree of divorce in behalf of appellee and the judgment of the court decreeing that Section 2, Certificate No. 15......
-
Peters v. Yacht
...state in which there is a statutory presumption that land acquired during a marriage is community property. Davis v. Duncan, 102 S.W.2d 287, 288 (Tex. Civ. App. 1937). Without further evidence that the house is Ms. Peter's separate property, the Court finds Plaintiff to be included within t......