Davy v. Moss, 4380-I

Decision Date09 January 1978
Docket NumberNo. 4380-I,4380-I
Citation19 Wn.App. 32,573 P.2d 826
PartiesWalter DAVY and Ruth Davy, d/b/a Local Plumbing, Appellants, v. Mr. Richard E. MOSS and Alice M. Moss, his wife, and the marital community composed thereof, John Doe Timbreza and Georgia Timbreza, his wife, and the marital community composed thereof, Defendants, Georgia Timbreza, Respondent, G. Dalin and Jane Doe Dalin, his wife, and the marital community composed thereof, Defendants.
CourtWashington Court of Appeals

Karr, Tuttle, Koch, Campbell, Mawer & Morrow, Charles A. Kimbrough, David D. Swartling, Philip A. Talmadge, Seattle, for appellants.

Steinberg & Steinberg, Jack Steinberg, Seattle, for respondents.

WILLIAMS, Judge.

The question on this appeal is whether the trial court, in an action for a breach of contract, erred in refusing to allow to the prevailing party the reasonable attorney's fees called for in RCW 4.84. The answer depends upon the meaning of "action for damages." We reverse.

Pertinent sections of the statute are:

Notwithstanding any other provisions of chapter 4.84 RCW and RCW 12.20.060, in any action for damages where the amount pleaded by the prevailing party as hereinafter defined, exclusive of costs, is one thousand dollars or less, there shall be taxed and allowed to the prevailing party as a part of the costs of the action a reasonable amount to be fixed by the court as attorneys' fees.

(Italics ours.) RCW 4.84.250.

The plaintiff, or party seeking relief, shall be deemed the prevailing party within the meaning of RCW 4.84.250 when the recovery, exclusive of costs, is as much as or more than the amount offered in settlement by the plaintiff, or party seeking relief, as set forth in RCW 4.84.280.

RCW 4.84.260.

The defendant, or party resisting relief, shall be deemed the prevailing party within the meaning of RCW 4.84.250, if the plaintiff, or party seeking relief, recovers nothing, or if the recovery, exclusive of costs, is the same as or less than the amount offered in settlement by the defendant, or the party resisting relief, as set forth in RCW 4.84.280.

RCW 4.84.270.

Offers of settlement shall be served on the adverse party in the manner prescribed by applicable court rules. Offers of settlement shall not be filed or communicated to the trier of the fact until after judgment, at which time a copy of said offer of settlement shall be filed for the purposes of determining attorneys' fees as set forth in RCW 4.84.250.

RCW 4.84.280.

The term "damages" has been defined as

the sum of money which the law awards or imposes as pecuniary compensation, recompense, or satisfaction for an injury done or a wrong sustained as a consequence either of a breach of a contractual obligation or a tortious act.

22 Am.Jur.2d Damages § 1 (1965). Otherwise,

The law of damages deals with the standards, rules, and processes used by the courts in measuring compensation for losses and injuries.

C....

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Target Nat'l Bank v. Higgins
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • March 20, 2014
    ...a trial court shall award the prevailing party attorney's fees if the statutory requirements are satisfied. Davy v. Moss, 19 Wash.App. 32, 33–34, 573 P.2d 826 (1978). ¶ 14 RCW 4.84.250 states in full: Notwithstanding any other provisions of chapter 4.84 RCW and RCW 12.20.060, in any action ......
  • Allianceone Receivables Mgmt., Inc. v. Lewis
    • United States
    • Washington Supreme Court
    • May 8, 2014
    ...4.84.250–.300 as a statutory scheme where each statute is given force in the context of related rules. See, e.g., Davy v. Moss, 19 Wash.App. 32, 33–34, 573 P.2d 826 (1978) (citing four provisions in their entirety to clarify the meaning of “action for damages” in chapter 4.84 RCW); Valley v......
  • Mose v. Stanley
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • August 2, 2021
    ...injury done or a wrong sustained as a consequence either of a breach of a contractual obligation or a tortious act." Davy v. Moss, 19 Wn.App. 32, 34, 573 P.2d 826 (1978) (quoting 22 Am. Jur. 2d Damages § 1 Washington courts thus construe actions for "damages" to include those based in tort ......
  • First National Bank of Omaha v. Gilchrist
    • United States
    • Washington Court of Appeals
    • October 18, 2016
    ... ... RCW 4.84.260. Both RCW 4.84.250 and ... 260 apply to contract actions. Davy v. Moss, 19 ... Wn.App. 32, 33-34, 573 P.2d 826 (1978) ... Here, ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT