DeCarlo v. Town of West Miami
| Decision Date | 12 December 1950 |
| Citation | 49 So.2d 596 |
| Parties | DE CARLO v. TOWN OF WEST MIAMI. |
| Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Yonge, Whiteside & Prunty and H. Earl Barber, all of Miami, for appellant.
Walton, Hubbard, Schroeder, Lantaff & Atkins, Miami, and Arthur W. Primm, Coral Gables, for appellee.
The plaintiff, appellant here, applied for a building permit to construct an apartment-storage building on her property, located in the Town of West Miami, appellee here, which was refused by the Town Clerk for the reason that the plaintiff's property was located in a portion of the town classified as residential under the town's zoning ordinance. By the terms of this ordinance, 'any person aggrieved or affected by any decision of an administrative officer given under the provisions of this ordinance' could appeal to the Town Council. The plaintiff could also, under the provisions of the ordinance, have applied to the Town Council for a variation or exception to the zoning restrictions. The ordinance provided for an appeal to the courts of any decision of the Town Council. The record does not show that the Town Council was given an opportunity to pass on the merits of plaintiff's claim, nor did plaintiff allege in her bill any reason for her failure to seek relief from the Town Council. The plaintiff's bill to enjoin the Town of West Miami from enforcing the zoning ordinance as to her particular property was dismissed by the lower court, and plaintiff appeals.
The principal issue to be decided on this appeal is as follows: May a party seek injunctive relief in a court of equity, on the ground that a zoning ordinance is invalid with respect to such person's property, without first having exhausted the administrative remedies available under such ordinance?
This question has been decided negatively here. See City of Miami v. Rosen, 151 Fla. 677, 10 So.2d 307.
The administrative boards usually provided for the consideration and review of zoning problems are made up of local people, having the advantage of full local information as to the reasons behind the various zoning regulations. Their findings, while not conclusive, are indeed helpful in the ultimate determination of the rights of the parties. Moreover, the inequalities of a zoning ordinance, if called to the attention of such local administrative boards, may frequently be adjusted at that level. Such boards should, at least, be given an opportunity to afford relief, or state their reasons for not doing so.
Having failed to exhaust her administrative remedies, the plaintiff's suit was prematurely filed, and there was no error in dismissing it.
THOMAS, J., not participating.
The plaintiff-appellant, Frances DeCarlo, filed her amended bill of complaint in the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, praying for an order restraining the Town of West Miami, a municipal corporation, from the enforcement of its zoning ordinance adopted November 15, 1948, in so far as the provisions of the said ordinance applied to the property of the appellant, and limited and restricted its use.
It is alleged that the provisions of the ordinance limit and restrict the use of the property described in the amended bill of complaint to a given use and the legal effect of the enforcement of the ordinance against appellant's property is to deny to her the enjoyment of her property vouchsafed or guaranteed by our Federal and State Constitutions.
A copy of the ordinance...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Town of Indialantic v. McNulty
...Rule 16B-25.05 .09; Maloney and O'Donnell, Drawing the Line at the Oceanfront, 30 Fla.L.Rev. 383, 388, 392 (1978).28 DeCarlo v. Town of West Miami, 49 So.2d 596 (Fla.1950); Union Trust v. Lucas, 125 So.2d 582 (Fla. 2d DCA 1960); Adams v. North Carolina Dept. of Natural and Economic Resource......
-
Sigfred v. Pan American World Airways
...and in doing so thus applied the traditional Florida view, Ervin v. City of North Miami Beach, Fla., 66 So.2d 235; DeCarlo v. Town of West Miami, Fla., 49 So.2d 596, and the most recent case Morrison v. Plotkin, Fla.1955, 77 So.2d 254. Moreover this is the view which the trial judge, famili......
-
Lepior v. Venice Tp.
...to appeal to the courts. Certain-teed Products Corp v Paris Twp, 351 Mich 434, 452 [88 N.W.2d 705 [1958]]. "See, also, DeCarlo v West Miami, 49 So 2d 596 [Fla, 1950]. "However, equity jurisdiction to hear an attack upon the constitutionality of a zoning ordinance has been frequently upheld ......
-
City of Miami v. Fraternal Order of Police Lodge No. 20 of City of Miami
...courts, one must pursue and exhaust any extrajudicial or administrative remedy which may provide the relief sought. DeCarlo v. Town of West Miami, 49 So.2d 596 (Fla.1950); Kaufman v. Machiedo, 357 So.2d 739 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978), cert. denied. 364 So.2d 888 (Fla.1978); General Electric Credit ......