Decker v. Worcester Jr. College
| Decision Date | 31 October 1975 |
| Citation | 336 N.E.2d 909,369 Mass. 960 |
| Parties | Carl C. DECKER et al. 1 v. WORCESTER JUNIOR COLLEGE. |
| Court | United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court |
Mel L. Greenberg, Worcester, for plaintiffs.
David P. Grossi, Leominster, for defendant.
Before TAURO, C.J., and REARDON, QUIRICO, BRAUCHER and WILKINS, JJ.
RESCRIPT.
The plaintiffs were reappointed in March, 1972, to the faculty of the defendant college (college) for the academic year 1972--1973. Each had received and countersigned annual letters of reappointment in prior years. Allegedly because of the college's financial problems, neither was reappointed similarly for the 1973--1974 academic year. They brought a bill for declaratory relief, seeking a determination that in effect they had been reappointed for another academic year because they had not received a lawfully effective notice of the termination of their appointments pursuant to an alleged policy and practice of the college. On ample evidence the judge found that the plaintiffs were not hired for the 1973--1974 academic year, and that, although they received no formal notice that they were not to be reappointed, the defendants 'knew and understood they were not to be rehired and their contract was but for one year.' He ordered that a decree be entered dismissing the bill. The plaintiffs appealed from such a decree, and we transferred the case to this court. The plaintiffs argue that the college had adopted a policy concerning faculty reappointments which requires formal notification on or about the first of March of each year that a faculty member was not to be reappointed and that, in the absence of such a notice, reappointment was automatic. If a college adopted such a formal procedure and communicated it to its faculty, the college could be bound to the terms of that procedure. Greene v. Howard Univ., 134 U.S.App.D.C. 81, 412 F.2d 1128, 1133--1135 (1969). Hillis v. Meister, 82 N.M. 474, 483 P.2d 1314 (Ct.App.1971). See Mendez v. Trustees of Boston Univ., 362 Mass. 353, 355, 285 N.E.2d 446 (1972); Rhine v. International Young Men's Christian Ass'n College, 339 Mass. 610, 162 N.E.2d 56 (1959). Here, however, the record shows no such commitment by the college. The executive committee of the college's board of directors adopted 'a policy of seeking to establish probable enrollment for each coming year in sufficient time to permit decisions to be made on faculty needs, and to allow faculty...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Piacitelli v. Southern Utah State College
...governing the employment relationship. Greene v. Howard University, 412 F.2d 1128 (D.C.Cir.1969); Decker v. Worcester Junior College, 369 Mass. 960, 336 N.E.2d 909 (1975); Hillis v. Meister, 82 N.M. 474, 483 P.2d 1314 (1971); Zimmerman v. Minot State College, N.D., 198 N.W.2d 108 (1972). 5 ......
-
Jackson v. Action for Boston Community Development, Inc.
...the plaintiff's letter of appointment, constituted part of the employment contract. Finally, in Decker v. Worcester Junior College, 369 Mass. 960, 961, 336 N.E.2d 909 (1975), we noted that, if the college had adopted a "formal procedure [for faculty reappointments] and communicated it to it......
-
Beckwith v. Rhode Island School of Design
...Moreover, there is no evidence of a college policy that, absent timely notice, renewal was automatic. Decker v. Worcester Junior College, 369 Mass. 960, 961, 336 N.E.2d 909, 910 (1975); Cf. Ferguson v. Thomas, 430 F.2d 852, 856 (5th Cir. 1970); Greene v. Howard University, 134 U.S.App.D.C. ......
-
Hoff v. Northeastern University
...of which provides for certain grievances arising from tenure review to be submitted to arbitration. See Decker v. Worcester Jr. College, 369 Mass. 960, 961, 336 N.E.2d 909 (1975), and cases cited; Jackson v. Action for Boston Community Dev., Inc., 403 Mass. 8, 13-14, 525 N.E.2d 411 (1988); ......