Dellagrotta v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.
| Decision Date | 24 March 1994 |
| Docket Number | No. 93-351-A,93-351-A |
| Citation | 639 A.2d 980 |
| Parties | Eileen DELLAGROTTA v. LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. |
| Court | Rhode Island Supreme Court |
This matter came before a panel of the Supreme Court pursuant to an order directing both parties to appear and to show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not be summarily decided. In this case the plaintiff, Eileen Dellagrotta, has appealed from a Superior Court judgment entered after a non-jury trial, which provided that an insurance policy issued by the defendant, Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., did not cover her injuries arising from an automobile accident on September 9, 1986.
After reviewing the memoranda submitted by the parties and after hearing their counsel in oral argument, this court concludes that cause has not been shown. In the Superior Court plaintiff sought benefits under the uninsured motorist provision of her husband's policy with defendant. Previous to this claim plaintiff had sued for and recovered $25,000 under the uninsured motorist provisions of her son's policy with Merchants Mutual Insurance Company. At the time of the accident plaintiff had been a passenger in the car of her adult son who made his home with plaintiff and her husband.
Uninsured motorist coverage is required by statute in Rhode Island. See G.L. 1956 (1989 Reenactment) § 27-7-2.1. This court has held however, that § 27-7-2.1 does not mandate the extension of uninsured motorist coverage to vehicles owned by policyholders but not insured by them. Employers' Fire Insurance Co. v. Baker, 119 R.I. 734, 741, 383 A.2d 1005, 1008-09 (1978). This court has also held that a restriction of uninsured motorist coverage only to family members who do not own their own vehicles does not violate public policy. Malo v. Aetna Casualty And Surety Co., 459 A.2d 954, 957 (R.I.1983).
"It is well settled * * * that when the terms of an insurance...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Am. States Ins. Co. v. LaFlam
...insured (or a family member) owns, but elects not to insure under the policy. See Viti, 850 A.2d at 107;Dellagrotta v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 639 A.2d 980, 980–81 (R.I.1994); Baker, 119 R.I. at 741, 383 A.2d at 1008–09;see also Malo v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., 459 A.2d 954, 956......
-
Carpenter v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co.
...of an insurance policy are found to be clear and unambiguous judicial construction is at an end.”) (quoting Dellagrotta v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 639 A.2d 980, 980 (R.I.1994)); Malo v. Aetna Cas. & Surety Co., 459 A.2d 954, 956 (R.I.1983) (insurance policies must be applied as written). Acc......
-
Henderson v. Nationwide Ins. Co.
...is at an end.” Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Viti, 850 A.2d 104, 106–07 (R.I.2004) (quoting Dellagrotta v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 639 A.2d 980, 980 (R.I.1994)). In that case, the policy's terms must be given their plain, ordinary meaning; the contract terms must then be applied ......
-
New London Cnty. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Fontaine
...on her uninsured motorcycle—under her automobile liability policy. Id. at 743, 383 A.2d at 1010. Similarly, in Dellagrotta v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 639 A.2d 980 (R.I.1994), this Court upheld the applicability of an “owned but not insured” exclusion to a UM claim for injuries suffere......