Demarco v. State
| Decision Date | 26 June 1975 |
| Citation | 37 N.Y.2d 735,374 N.Y.S.2d 619 |
| Parties | , 337 N.E.2d 131 Frances DeMARCO, Appellant, v. The STATE of New York, Respondent, and Royal Globe Insurance Company, Defendant. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Order affirmed, without costs, on the memorandum at the Appellate Division, 43 A.D.2d 786, 350 N.Y.S.2d 230.
All concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
15 cases
-
Kelly v. State
...provisions are jurisdictional (De Marco v. State, 43 A.D.2d 786, 350 N.Y.S.2d 230, affd. on memo below, 37 N.Y.2d 735, 374 N.Y.S.2d 619, 337 N.E.2d 131), and failure of compliance with them therefore requires the dismissal of the claim unless the Court of Claims permits late filing in the e......
- Antoine v. State
-
Estate of Santana
......Haydee Santana, Individually, for an order granting . permission to file a Claim against the NEW YORK STATE . THRUWAY AUTHORITY and the State of New York. . Motion No. M-19746. . Court of Claims of New York. . Nov. 4, 1977. . Page 397 . ... (Sessa v. State of New York, 88 Misc.2d 454, 458, 388 N.Y.S.2d 513, 516, (Court of Claims, 1976); DeMarco v. State of New York, 43 A.D.2d 786, 350 N.Y.S.2d . Page 399 . 230 affd. 37 N.Y.2d 735, 374 N.Y.S.2d 619, 237 N.E.2d 131.) As stated by Judge ......
-
Woodley v. State
...met before such discretion could be exercised. (See De Marco v. State, 43 A.D.2d 786, 787, 350 N.Y.S.2d 230, 231, affd. 37 N.Y.2d 735, 374 N.Y.S.2d 619, 337 N.E.2d 131.) The new subdivision 6 requires only that the Court 'consider' certain factors, among others. We believe this change in la......
Request a trial to view additional results