Dill v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.

Decision Date16 November 1923
Docket Number11348.
Citation120 S.E. 61,126 S.C. 303
PartiesDILL ET AL. v. SOVEREIGN CAMP, W. O. W.
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court

Appeal from Common Pleas Circuit Court of Greenville County; T. S Sease, Judge.

Action by Flora Dill and others against the Sovereign Camp of Woodmen of the World. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Cothran and Marion, JJ., dissenting.

Hodges & Leatherwood, of Greenville, for appellant.

Dean Cothran & Wyche, of Greenville, for respondents.

GARY C.J.

This is an action on a policy of insurance in the sum of $1,000 issued by the defendant on the life of J. L. Dill (who died on the 5th of December, 1921), in favor of Flora Dill, his wife, and his surviving children, the plaintiffs herein.

The defendant denied liability, and set up as a defense the provision contained in the policy, that, "if a member dies by his own hand or act, whether, sane or insane," it should thereby become null and void.

The case was tried before his honor, Judge Sease, and a jury, and resulted in a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs for $1,000, and the defendant appealed upon the following exceptions:

(1) "That his honor, the presiding judge, erred in overruling the defendant's motion for a directed verdict, made on the ground that the application for a policy, the policy itself, and the constitution and by-laws of the Woodmen of the World provided that the policy is not payable if the deceased came to his death by his own hand or act, and that the testimony is susceptible of no other inference than that the deceased came to his death by his own hand and act."
(2) "That his honor, the presiding judge, erred in refusing to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant upon the ground that the testimony was susceptible of no other inference than that the deceased came to his death by his own hand and act."

The record contains this statement:

"At the conclusion of the testimony a motion for a directed verdict in favor of the defendant was made on the ground that the application for a policy, the policy itself, and the constitution and by-laws of the Woodmen of the World provided that the policy is not payable if the deceased came to his death by his own hand or act, and that the testimony is susceptible of no other inference than that the deceased did come to his death by his own hand and act, upon which motion the court made the following ruling:
' In the McKendree Case I felt certain there was no other reasonable inference to be drawn other than that he had committed suicide, and I directed a verdict. After seeing the lawyers they told me frankly I had put it on the wrong ground, and they thought the Supreme Court would reverse me on the ground of suicide. The Supreme Court did reverse me, saying I was in error in directing a verdict, as it was for the jury to say whether there was any other inference to be drawn. So the question must be submitted to the jury. That is the law, and the motion is refused.' "

The following witnesses testified in behalf of the respective parties, as follows:

Mrs. Furman Sloan, for defendant:

"I live in sight of the Dills. She stayed at my house about two weeks after he died. She told me she kept the oldest son out of school as Mr. Dill seemed to be off a little bit. At that time she was talking about his death, but did not say anything else about his mental condition. We just talked about him being off a little, and she kept her son out of school to help gather the corn."

Furman Sloan, for defendant:

"I live 6 miles north of Greer, and about one-fourth mile from Mr. Dill's house. I had not gotten up when I heard the screaming of the Dill family. I dressed as fast as I could and ran over there. I saw Mr. Dill hanging there by a plow line and he appeared to be recently dead. He was hanging from the limb by a plow line on the side of the gate next to the house. The rope was doubled and was looped around the neck. When I got there Campbell and Fitts were there. I did not make an investigation and stayed only a few minutes. I didn't particularly notice any tracks, and saw nothing around the place or on the body to indicate a struggle. I saw the doctor examine the body and saw no marks of violence. Mr. Dill's feet were 4 or 6 feet above the ground, and the limb was 3 or 4 feet above the gate. I saw some dirt on the gate some time through the day, but don't know that I noticed it that morning. From the top of the gate a man could reach up and tie a rope around the limb. The rope was 14 or 15 feet long and was doubled. I have known Mr. Dill 14 or 15 years, and did not know that he had any enemies in the community. I don't know much about Mr. Dill's mental condition, but it appeared to me as if his mind were off some. I don't know of any cause for mental trouble recently before his death."

F. B. Fitts, for defendant:

"I examined around the place for other tracks to see if I could discover where anybody else had a hand in the hanging, and say no others except about 10 steps I saw what looked like children's tracks. I was the first one to get to the place, and Campbell was right behind me. I looked for evidence of foul play and found none. Mr. Dill's clothes were not disturbed, and there were no signs of a man struggling or being carried by other persons. I have known Mr. Dill about 9 years. Three to five days before he died he seemed restless and talked a little to me, and said that he hated to move from where he had lived. He said he had made 7 crops there and was bothered about moving. He was a strong hard working kind of man. When I talked to him he was on foot. He asked me how I was getting along and said he wished John Henson had not died and he would not have had to move. He didn't tell me where he was going nor that he was nervous. He turned and looked off
when I was talking, which wasn't an unusual matter for him. I studied about the conversation afterwards, but didn't think anything serious was going to happen. The tracks seemed to come down the path to the house and went up to the end of the gate. Inside the pasture there was a hog lot. I did not see a hog that day and was not looking for hogs. I cannot say whether the shoe that made the track was a 7, 8, or 9. Where I saw the track was in sand and pine needles. To the best of my knowledge the tracks were Dill's tracks. The shoe has a tolerable low heel of leather."

J. M. Duncan, for defendant:

"I live 6 miles from Greer, about one-fourth mile from where Mr. Dill lives. I went to the place where Mr. Dill was hanging between 7 and 8 o'clock in the morning. I did not make a particular examination of the ground, as there had been several there. I saw sand on the planks of the gate. I believe from the marks I saw on the gate that a man standing there could have tied the rope, looped it around his neck, jumped off and hung himself. I heard Mr. Dill's little boy say that morning that his father said before he died that he would rather die than move where he was going. I could not say exactly where I was when he told me that, but I was not far from where Mr. Dill was hanging. I don't think any one was present when the boy told me that. It was the oldest boy, whose name is Alvin. I don't remember that I ever told any one about what the little boy said."

S. D. Henson, for defendant:

"I went to the place where Mr. Dill was found about 7 or 8 o'clock in the morning. There were several persons there, and I saw Mr. Dill hanging to the limb of the tree. There was a draw knot at the limb, and the loop was around his neck. He was dead. I saw some tracks leading from the house, but several people were there when I got there. I saw marks of sand on the gate on one crosspiece. It seemed to me that Dill's mind was off some. I saw him the week before, but didn't know whether he was off or just seemed like he was not always like he had appeared. I had no talk with him, and didn't see him until the morning when
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • McMillan v. General American Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 22, 1940
    ... ... jury, there was error ...           Dill ... v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 126 S.C. 303, 120 S.E. 61, ... 64, 37 A.L.R. 167. In this case ... ...
  • Marsh v. Pioneer-Pyramid Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 5, 1934
    ... ... Commonwealth Life Insurance Co. of Kentucky, 134 S.C ... 435, 132 S.E. 828; Dill v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., ... 126 S.C. 303, 120 S.E. 61, 37 A. L. R. 167; ... [176 S.E. 880] ... ...
  • Mandis v. New York Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • September 16, 1935
    ... ... Southern States Life ... Insurance Co. of Alabama, 112 S.C. 335, 99 S.E. 806; and ... Dill" v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W., 126 S.C. 303, 120 ... S.E. 61, 37 A. L. R. 167 ...         \xC2" ... ...
  • McLane v. Reliance Life Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • December 12, 1939
    ... ... Dill v. W. O. W., 126 S.C ... 303, 120 S.E. 61, 37 A.L.R. 167; Swofford v. Life ... Insurance Co., ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT