Dillard v. Dillard, S95A0733
| Decision Date | 05 June 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. S95A0733,S95A0733 |
| Citation | 458 S.E.2d 102,265 Ga. 478 |
| Parties | DILLARD v. DILLARD. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Galen A. Mirate, Griner & Mirate, Valdosta, Ellisa Garrett, Susan Pearce Tate, Athens, for James Randall Dillard.
J. Hue Henry, Henry & Pearson, P.C., Regina M. Quick, Athens, for Debra Arnball Dillard.
The parties divorced in 1991. The divorce decree obligates the husband to make a specific number of alimony payments in specific amounts, and terminates the husband's alimony obligation upon the wife's remarriage. The husband petitioned for modification of alimony in 1993. The trial court dismissed the petition, finding that the husband's obligation is for lump-sum alimony and as such is not subject to modification. The issue before us is whether the obligation is in fact for lump-sum alimony, or is instead for periodic alimony and subject to modification. Because there are limitations on the husband's obligation inconsistent with lump-sum alimony, we hold that the obligation is for periodic alimony, and we reverse the trial court.
An obligation is considered lump-sum alimony if it states the exact number and amount of payments "without other limitations, conditions or statements of intent." 1 The obligation in this case does state the number and amount of alimony payments, but it also contains "other limitations, conditions or statements of intent" characteristic of periodic alimony. For example, periodic alimony terminates when the receiving spouse remarries, 2 as does this obligation. Also, an obligation is considered periodic alimony where the total amount of the obligation is contingent and "cannot be determined at present." 3 In this case, the total sum owed by the husband cannot be determined, as it depends upon whether or not the wife remarries. Thus the husband's obligation is for periodic alimony, and as periodic alimony the obligation is subject to modification.
Judgment reversed.
All the Justices concur.
2 See OCGA § 19-6-5(b); see also Stone v. Stone, 254 Ga. 519(1), 330 S.E.2d 887 (1985).
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Daniel v. Daniel
...S.E.2d 64 (1979), overruled on other grounds, Winokur v. Winokur, 258 Ga. 88, 90(1), 365 S.E.2d 94 (1988). See also Dillard v. Dillard, 265 Ga. 478, 458 S.E.2d 102 (1995). Husband applied for a discretionary appeal, but his application was When Husband did not pay, Wife moved that he be hel......
-
Hawkins v. Hawkins
...a life insurance policy for the benefit of the children).2 Sapp v. Sapp, 259 Ga. 238, 378 S.E.2d 674 (1989); see Dillard v. Dillard, 265 Ga. 478, 458 S.E.2d 102 (1995) (alimony payments were periodic alimony when they terminated on the remarriage of the receiving spouse).3 Winstead v. Winst......
-
Rivera v. Rivera
...the exact number and amount of payments `without other limitations, conditions or statements of intent.' [Cit.]" Dillard v. Dillard, 265 Ga. 478, 479, 458 S.E.2d 102 (1995). See also Shepherd v. Collins, 283 Ga. 124, 125, 657 S.E.2d 197 (2008); Winokur v. Winokur, supra (disapproving Nash o......
-
Coursey v. Coursey, S16A0263
...by an indefinite number of payments and may also be contingent or indeterminable as to a total amount. See Dillard v. Dillard , 265 Ga. 478, 458 S.E.2d 102 (1995). Periodic alimony typically terminates on the death of the paying spouse, the death of the surviving spouse, or the remarriage o......
-
Domestic Relations
...402, 847 S.E.2d 392 (2020).7. Id. at 402, 847 S.E.2d at 392.8. Id. at 403, 847 S.E.2d at 393.9. Id.10. Id. (quoting Dillard v. Dillard, 265 Ga. 478, 479, 458 S.E.2d 102, 103 (1995)).11. . Id.12. Id. (citing O.C.G.A. § 19-6-21 (2021); Rivera v. Rivera, 283 Ga. 547, 549, 661 S.E.2d 541, 543 (......