Dingman v. Ard

• Decision Date: 30 January 1948
• Citation: 160 Fla. 115,33 So.2d 718
• Parties: DINGMAN v. ARD et al.
• Court: Florida Supreme Court

33 So.2d 718

160 Fla. 115

DINGMAN v. ARD et al.

Florida Supreme Court

January 30, 1948

Appeal from Circuit Court, Duval County; Claude Ogilvie, judge.

J. Ollie Edmunds, of Jacksonville, for appellant.

Katz & Katz, of Jacksonville, for J. A. Ard and Cora Lee Ard, his wife, and John Allen Tatem and Vernall Hazel Tatem, his wife, and Rogers, Towers and Bailey and Elmer Norton for George L. Whitley and Ida E. Whitley, his wife, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

On appeal here we are requested to reverse for enumerated reasons the decree of the Chancellor, which, as shown by a careful study of the record, appears to have been based largely on disputes and conflicts in the evidence. We have given all the testimony appearing in the transcript careful consideration; the briefs filed in the cause have been read, and the authorities cited examined. It is our view, and we so hold, that we are not justified, as a matter of law, in interfering with the decree appealed from and accordingly the same is affirmed. See Travis v. Travis, 81 Fla. 309, 87 So. 762; Webb v. Webb, 145 Fla. 267, 199 So. 343; Windham v. Windham, 152 Fla. 362, 11 So.2d 797.

THOMAS, C. J., and TERRELL, CHAPMAN and SEBRING, JJ., concur.