Dixon v. State, 17191

Decision Date12 July 1950
Docket NumberNo. 17191,17191
Citation207 Ga. 192,60 S.E.2d 439
PartiesDIXON v. STATE.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Casey Thigpen, J. D. Godfrey, Sandersville, for plaintiff in error.

J. Cecil Davis, Sol. Gen., Warrenton, for defendant in error.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

ALMAND, Justice.

Dixon was convicted of voluntary manslaughter and given a sentence of from eight to ten years. He thereafter filed a motion, praying that the judgment and sentence be set aside, alleging that the same were void because the verdict fixed no minimum or maximum sentence, and because the sentence was a nullity because the judge therein ordered the defendant imprisoned as ordered by the Prison Commission of Georgia, whereas there was no such Prison Commission, the same having been abolished prior to the indictment of the defendant. The motion alleged that the movant had been deprived of rights guaranteed to him by the due-process clauses of the State and Federal Constitutions, Const.1945 art. 1, § 1 par. 3; Const. U.S. Amend. 14. The trial judge sustained general demurrers filed to the motion by the solicitor general, and dismissed the motion. The movant excepted. In his bill of exceptions, it is stated: 'Supreme Court of Georgia has jurisdiction and not the Court of Appeals of Georgia, as this case is one which involves a construction of due-process clauses' of the State and Federal Constitutions. Held:

'A mere assertion that one has been deprived of a right under the Constitution of this State or of a right under the Federal Constitution is insufficient to confer jurisdiction on the Supreme Court. In order for the Supreme Court to have jurisdiction, the case must involve a 'construction of the constitution where the meaning of some provision thereof is directly in question, or is doubtful by force of its own terms or under the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States or of the Supreme Court of Georgia.' Accordingly, since the petition in this case involves a mere application of unquestioned and unambiguous provisions of the Constitution to a given state of facts, the Supreme Court is without jurisdiction.' Jarvis v. State, 197 Ga. 704, 30 S.E.2d 484, 485, and cases there cited.

Transferred to the Court of Appeals.

All the Justices concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • Beasley v. Georgia Power Co., 17176
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 12 Julio 1950
    ... ... 189, 3 S.E.2d 674; MacNeill v. Maddox, 194 Ga. 802, 22 S.E.2d 653; Edge v. State, 199 Ga. 431, 34 S.E.2d 498. In some of these cases the bill of exceptions was dismissed on motion ... ...
  • McCrary v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 7 Abril 1960
    ...court jurisdiction of the case. Rowland v. State, 199 Ga. 340, 34 S.E.2d 577; Boyett v. State, 205 Ga. 370, 53 S.E.2d 919; Dixon v. State, 207 Ga. 192, 60 S.E.2d 439; Robinson v. State, 209 Ga. 48, 70 S.E.2d 514. The mere fact that a capital offense is charged in an indictment does not give......
  • Civils v. Fulton County, 21975
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 7 Marzo 1963
    ...176 Ga. 385, 168 S.E. 15; Chastain v. Alford, 191 Ga. 677, 13 S.E.2d 769; Jarvis v. State, 197 Ga. 704, 30 S.E.2d 484; Dixon v. State, 207 Ga. 192, 60 S.E.2d 439; Robinson v. State, 209 Ga. 48, 70 S.E.2d 514. The jurisdiction of the present case is the Court of Appeals and not this Transfer......
  • Prather v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 22 Junio 1967
    ...of a statute but only the question of application of criminal procedures and related issues not involving a capital felony. Dixon v. State, 207 Ga. 192, 60 S.E.2d 439; Robinson v. State, 209 Ga. 48, 70 S.E.2d 514; Giles v. State, 212 Ga. 465, 93 S.E.2d 739; Waller v. Conner, 218 Ga. 633, 12......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT