Doe v. Berkeley Publishers, 24765
Citation | 329 S.C. 412,496 S.E.2d 636 |
Decision Date | 06 November 1997 |
Docket Number | No. 24765,24765 |
Parties | John DOE, Respondent, v. BERKELEY PUBLISHERS, d/b/a The Berkeley Independent, Petitioner. . Heard |
Court | South Carolina Supreme Court |
Jay Bender and Charles E. Baker, both of Baker, Barwick, Ravenel & Bender, L.L.P., Columbia, for petitioner.
Thomas R. Goldstein, of Belk, Cobb, Infinger & Goldstein, P.A., Charleston, for respondent.
We granted certiorari to review that part of the Court of Appeals' opinion which reversed the trial court's order directing a verdict for petitioner on respondent's invasion of privacy claim. Doe v. Berkeley Publishers, d/b/a The Berkeley Independent, 322 S.C. 307, 471 S.E.2d 731 (Ct.App.1996). We reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.
Respondent's claim is based on the petitioner's truthful reporting that respondent was the victim of a sexual assault by an inmate while both were incarcerated at the Berkeley County jail. 1 The issue in an invasion of privacy claim is whether the occurrence is a matter of legitimate public or general interest. Meetze v. The Associated Press, 230 S.C. 330, 95 S.E.2d 606 (1956). While ordinarily the issue whether an occurrence meets this test is a question of fact for the jury, under some circumstances it may be a question of law for the court. Compare Hawkins v. Multimedia, 288 S.C. 569, 344 S.E.2d 145 (1986) ( ) with Meetze, supra ( ). We hold that the commission of a violent crime between inmates of a county jail is a matter of public significance as a matter of law.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Bauer v. Summey
...‘then the publication of his connection with such an occurrence is not an invasion of his right to privacy.’ " Doe v. Berkeley Publishers, 329 S.C. 412, 496 S.E.2d 636, 637 (1998) (quoting Meetze, 95 S.E.2d at 609 ). As the court has discussed throughout its order, efforts to reduce the spr......
-
Burton v. York County Sheriff's Dept.
...the publication of his connection with such an occurrence is not an invasion of his right to privacy.'" Doe v. Berkeley Publishers, 329 S.C. 412, 414, 496 S.E.2d 636, 637 (1998) (quoting Meetze, 230 S.C. at 337, 95 S.E.2d at In the present case, we find the manner in which the employees of ......
-
Burton v. York County Sheriff's Department, Opinion No. 3771 (S.C. App. 4/5/2004)
...the publication of his connection with such an occurrence is not an invasion of his right to privacy.'" Doe v. Berkeley Publishers, 329 S.C. 412, 414, 496 S.E.2d 636, 637 (1998) (quoting Meetze, 230 S.C. at 337, 95 S.E.2d at In the present case, we find the manner in which the employees of ......
-
Garcia v. Brown
...then the publication of his connection with such an occurrence is not an invasion of his right to privacy." Doe v. BerkeleyPubl'rs, 496 S.E.2d 636, 637 (S.C. 1998) (citation omitted) (rejecting a privacy claim based on the defendant's truthful reporting that plaintiff was a victim of a sexu......
-
The Modern Penny Dreadful: Public Prosecution and the Need for Litigation Privacy in a Digital Age
...they were duplicative of defamation claims. Denver Publ'g Co. v. Bueno, 54 P.3d 893, 894 (Colo. 2002). 183. Doe v. Berkeley Publishers, 496 S.E.2d 636 (S.C. 184. Id. at 636. 185. Id. at 637. 186. See, e.g., Huon v. Denton, 841 F.3d 733 (7th Cir. 2016) (regarding an acquittee who filed tort ......