Doe v. Richland County School Dist. Two
Decision Date | 25 March 2009 |
Docket Number | No. 4521.,4521. |
Citation | 382 S.C. 656,677 S.E.2d 610 |
Parties | Jane DOE, a high school student in Richland County School District Two, and her parent, Mary Doe, Respondents, v. RICHLAND COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT TWO, Appellant. |
Court | South Carolina Court of Appeals |
Kenneth L. Childs, Vernie L. Williams, and Jasmine S. Rogers, all of Columbia, for Appellant.
Kimaka Nichols-Graham and Thomas L. Bruce, both of Greenville, for Respondents.
The Richland County School District Two Board of Trustees (Board) expelled Jane Doe from high school for committing a sexual offense. The circuit court reversed, finding the Board's decision was not supported by substantial evidence and violated her due process rights. Richland County School District Two (District) appeals. We affirm.
Jane Doe, a fourteen-year-old high-school student, began the school year enrolled in the District's alternative school at Blythewood Academy (Academy). In August, the Academy suspended Doe for two days after she engaged in a verbal altercation with another student. Less than a month later, a video camera captured Doe following a male student into the boys' restroom. According to Doe, she entered the boys' restroom to retrieve a comb the student had taken from her. Doe remained in the boys' restroom for about a minute until another male student entered the restroom; then, Doe exited the restroom.
Following this incident, the Academy suspended Doe for ten days and recommended expulsion for the remainder of the year. According to the Academy, Doe committed a sexual offense when she entered the boys' restroom with another male student.1 In a letter to Doe, the District notified her of the Academy's recommendation, the date of the upcoming evidentiary hearing, and her procedural rights. Prior to the hearing, the District recorded over the videotape before Doe was allowed to view it. The school administrator and the hearing officer watched the tape prior to its destruction and reported only observing Doe enter the boys' restroom following a male student. The District did not present any additional evidence suggesting Doe committed a sexual offense. Nonetheless, the hearing officer found Doe committed a sexual offense and expelled her for the remainder of the year.
Doe timely appealed the hearing officer's decision to the Board. The Board, however, upheld the hearing officer's decision. Doe appealed the Board's decision to the circuit court pursuant to section 59-63-240 of the South Carolina Code (Supp.2008). The circuit court reversed, finding substantial evidence did not support the Board's decision to expel Doe for committing a sexual offense. In addition, the court found Doe's due process rights were violated. This appeal followed.
A school board's decision to expel a student from school "may be appealed to the proper court." S.C.Code Ann. § 59-63-240 (Supp.2008); see Davis v. Sch. Dist. of Greenville County, 374 S.C. 39, 44, 647 S.E.2d 219, 222 (2007) ( ). Judicial review of the school board's decision is limited to ascertaining whether the board's decision is supported by substantial evidence. Laws v. Richland County Sch. Dist. No. 1, 270 S.C. 492, 495, 243 S.E.2d 192, 193 (1978). However, this court cannot substitute its judgment for that of the educational authorities. Id.
According to the District, Doe's voluntary act of entering the boys' restroom with a male student amounted to a sexual offense. Thus, the District asserts, given this incident and Doe's prior disciplinary history,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Blackburn v. Daufuskie Island Fire Dist.
... ... We affirm ... Appellant is a Special Purpose Tax District within Beaufort County which provides fire protection services to the residents of Daufuskie Island. Appellant employed ... School Dist. No. 1, 34 Or. App. 425, 578 P.2d 820 (1978) (holding that the state statute entitling public ... ...
-
Tariq By G. His Mother, Lisa Geer v. Anderson Cnty. Sch. Dist. 5
...authorities:1. As to whether substantial evidence supported the School District's decision: Doe v. Richland Cty. Sch. Dist. Two, 382 S.C. 656, 659, 677 S.E.2d 610, 611 (Ct. App. 2009) ("Judicial review of the school board's decision is limited to ascertaining whether the board's decision is......
-
Tariq G. v. Anderson County School District 5
... ... 1. As ... to whether substantial evidence supported the School ... District's decision: Doe v. Richland Cty. Sch. Dist ... Two, 382 S.C. 656, 659, 677 S.E.2d 610, 611 (Ct. App ... 2009) ("Judicial review of the school board's ... ...