Domutz v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., No. 47932
| Court | United States State Supreme Court of Florida |
| Writing for the Court | ADKINS; OVERTON |
| Citation | 339 So.2d 636 |
| Decision Date | 12 November 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 47932 |
| Parties | Louis DOMUTZ, Petitioner, v. SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Self-Insured, and the Florida Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents. |
Page 636
v.
SOUTHERN BELL TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Self-Insured, and the Florida Industrial Relations Commission, Respondents.
Stephen Marc Slepin of Kaplan, Schwartz & Slepin, Tallahassee, and Gerald E. Vick, Miami, for petitioner.
Richard J. Thornton of Walton, Lantaff, Schroeder, Carson & Wahl, Miami, for respondents.
Page 637
ADKINS, Justice.
This case is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review an order of the Industrial Relations Commission which reversed a compensation order of the Judge of Industrial Claims in favor of petitioner Domutz.
Petitioner had a service-connected 40 per cent permanent partial disability of the body as a whole upon his employment by respondent Southern Bell Telephone and Telegraph Company. During this period of employment petitioner suffered a compensable injury to his back in 1965, and while still recovering from this injury suffered an additional compensable injury to his back in 1967. The parties stipulated that petitioner was permanently and totally disabled as a result of his injuries. The Judge of Industrial Claims awarded petitioner permanent total disability, medical and hospital bills, costs and attorney's fees and disallowed any setoff of disability compensation for pension benefits to which petitioner did not contribute. The Industrial Relations Commission reversed only that part of the award to petitioner wherein a setoff was disallowed for pension benefits paid to petitioner.
The sole question for our decision here is whether an employer is entitled to a credit against workmen's compensation benefits in the amount of pension benefits which petitioner received, but to which he had not contributed, where the total award including the pension benefits did not exceed petitioner's average weekly wage.
As we determined in the case of Brown v. S. S. Kresge Company, Inc., 305 So.2d 191, 194 (Fla.1974),
'(B)ecause under a logical interpretation of the I.R.C. Rule 9 when an injured employee receives the equivalent of his full wages from whatever employer source that should be the limit of compensation to which he is entitled.'
There the issue was whether sick leave benefits provided by an employer should be credited against workmen's compensation injury benefits, and we determined that the decisive factor was not who had contributed to the plan, but rather whether the combination of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
City of Hollywood v. Lombardi, SC96482.
...insurance benefits)); Brown v. S.S. Kresge Co., 305 So.2d 191 (Fla.1974) (sick leave benefits); Domutz v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 339 So.2d 636 (Fla.1976) (pension benefits). Although in Jewel Tea the employee contributed to the benefits, in Barragan we cited Domutz for the propositi......
-
HRS DIST. II v. Pickard, 98-1097.
...the 100 percent AWW cap discussed in Brown v. S.S. Kresge Co., 305 So.2d 191 (Fla.1974); Domutz v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 339 So.2d 636 (Fla.1976); and Barragan v. City of Miami, 545 So.2d 252 (Fla.1989), to the combination of workers' compensation, social security disability, and s......
-
Barragan v. City of Miami, s. 71662
...benefits, regardless of whether the employee contributed to the funding of these benefits. Domutz v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 339 So.2d 636 (Fla.1976). However, the total benefits from all sources cannot exceed the employee's weekly wage. Domutz; Originally, the rule was different wit......
-
Medina v. Miami Dade Cnty., 1D19-1410
...the total benefits from all sources cannot exceed the employee's weekly wage." Id. at 254 (citing Domutz v. S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 339 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 1976) ; Brown v. S.S. Kresge Co., 305 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1974) ).5 Following the merits hearing, the Employer filed a supplemental Trial Me......
-
City of Hollywood v. Lombardi, SC96482.
...insurance benefits)); Brown v. S.S. Kresge Co., 305 So.2d 191 (Fla.1974) (sick leave benefits); Domutz v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 339 So.2d 636 (Fla.1976) (pension benefits). Although in Jewel Tea the employee contributed to the benefits, in Barragan we cited Domutz for the propositi......
-
HRS DIST. II v. Pickard, 98-1097.
...the 100 percent AWW cap discussed in Brown v. S.S. Kresge Co., 305 So.2d 191 (Fla.1974); Domutz v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 339 So.2d 636 (Fla.1976); and Barragan v. City of Miami, 545 So.2d 252 (Fla.1989), to the combination of workers' compensation, social security disability, and s......
-
Barragan v. City of Miami, s. 71662
...benefits, regardless of whether the employee contributed to the funding of these benefits. Domutz v. Southern Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 339 So.2d 636 (Fla.1976). However, the total benefits from all sources cannot exceed the employee's weekly wage. Domutz; Originally, the rule was different wit......
-
Medina v. Miami Dade Cnty., 1D19-1410
...the total benefits from all sources cannot exceed the employee's weekly wage." Id. at 254 (citing Domutz v. S. Bell Tel. & Tel. Co., 339 So. 2d 636 (Fla. 1976) ; Brown v. S.S. Kresge Co., 305 So. 2d 191 (Fla. 1974) ).5 Following the merits hearing, the Employer filed a supplemental Trial Me......