Dorsett v. Dorsett

Decision Date04 February 1936
Citation90 S.W.2d 188,232 Mo.App. 126
PartiesE. LEE DORSETT, (PLAINTIFF), APPELLANT, v. LUOILLE McD. DORSETT, (DEFENDANT), RESPONDENT
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Appeal from the Circuit Court of City of St. Louis, Div. No 3.--Hon. Robert W. Hall, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Judgment affirmed.

Watts & Gentry for appellant.

A court of equity has the power to modify a contract between husband and wife when shown that the contract is inequitable toward either party. Hoffman v. St. Louis Trust Co., 68 Mo.App. 177, 180; Egger v. Egger, 225 Mo. 116; Jones v. McGonigle, 37 S.W.2d 892; Hendricks v Isaacs, 117 N.Y. 411, 22 N.E. 1029; Hungerford v Hungerford, 161 N.Y. 550, 56 N.E. 117-118; Lister v. Lister, 86 N.J.Eq. 30, 48; Demarest v. Terhune, 62 N.J.Eq. 663, 667; Halstead v. Halstead, 74 N.J.Eq. 596, 598.

Jacob M. and Arthur V. Lashly for respondent.

A petition states no cause of action in equity for the reformation or modification of a written contract alleged to have been made between the appellant (plaintiff in the trial court) and the respondent (defendant in the trial court) during their relationship of husband and wife, where the sole and only ground alleged in support of a reformation of modification of the contract is the subsequently occurring and present financial embarrassment and inability of the husband to perform said contract; and such a petition states no cause of action for injunctive relief, enjoining the wife from enforcing said contract on the law side of the court. Stoddard v. Stoddard, 227 N.Y. 13, 124 N.E. 91; Adams v. Adams, 32 Pa. S.Ct. 353; Vandegrift v. Vandegrift, 63 N.J.Eq. 124, 51 A. 200; Gilsey v. Gilsey, 195 Mo.App. 205, 193 S.W. 858; Rough v. Rough, 195 S.W. 501; Banner v. Banner, 184 Mo.App. 396, 171 S.W. 2.

HOSTETTER, P. J. Becker and McCullen, JJ., concur.

OPINION

HOSTETTER, P. J.

This suit was instituted in the circuit court of the city of St. Louis on the 18th day of January, 1932, by the filing of a petition, which, caption and signatures omitted, is as follows:

"PETITION.

"Plaintiff states that he and the defendant were formerly husband and wife, having been married about the year 1914, and that the married relation between them continued to exist until they were divorced on or about the 21st day of September, 1928, by decree of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis Missouri, duly entered on said last-mentioned date, in a certain suit brought in said court by the said Lucile McD. Dorsett against this plaintiff for the purpose of obtaining a divorce from him.

"Plaintiff further states that while the relation of husband and wife still existed between him and the defendant, a certain contract in writing was duly entered into between them, duly executed by both plaintiff and defendant on or about the 19th day of September, 1928, which contract was and is as follows:

"'This agreement executed as of the 1st day of June, 1928, by and between Lucile McDonald Dorsett, of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, first party, E. Lee Dorsett, of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, second party, and Fletcher R. Harris, third party, witnesseth; That,

"'Whereas, first and second parties are husband and wife and reside in the City of St. Louis, Missouri, and

"'Whereas, disagreements have arisen between first and second parties as husband and wife, and

"'Whereas, said first and second parties desire to agree upon and make full and complete settlement and adjustment of the financial affairs and property rights of first and second parties, to provide for the future support and maintenance of first party, for the division of the joint property of first and second parties between said parties, and for the full and complete settlement and adjustment of all claims of first party against second party, for maintenance and support, as well as all dower and other rights or claims of first party to or against the property now owned or which may be hereafter acquired by second party, and in case of divorce or legal separation, for alimony pendente lite, suit money and attorneys' fees, and alimony in gross; and,

"'Whereas said third party has, at the request of first and second parties hereto, agreed to act as trustee for the purposes hereinafter set out;

"'Now, therefore, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein, it is hereby agreed by and between said parties as follows:

"'First. The undersigned third party herein, or his successor in office shall, for the purpose of this agreement, be and he is hereby constituted trustee of first and second parties for the purpose and with the powers and duties hereinafter more fully set forth.

"'Second. First and second parties hereby agree that, immediately upon the execution of this instrument and contemporaneously therewith, they will execute, acknowledge and deliver to third party a warranty deed conveying the real estate situated in the City of St. Louis, Missouri, and improved with premises known and numbered as 5093 Washington Boulevard, and third party shall and will thereupon and thereafter use his best efforts to sell the same for the best price obtainable, subject to certain deed of trust now outstanding against said property and recorded at page 494, Book 3652, in the office of the Recorder of Deeds in the City of St. Louis, Missouri. Pending the sale of said real estate, second party assumes and agrees to pay the interest and other payments and perform the covenants which first and second parties are required to perform under the terms of said deed of trust; and pending said sale second party further agrees to pay the taxes, general and special, due or to become due on said real estate, and to assign and deliver to the holder of said deed of trust or to third party herein all fire and tornado insurance policies now in force upon the improvements upon said real estate, and that said policies shall be properly endorsed so as to protect the interests of the holder of said deed of trust and of the parties to this agreement, and that second party shall continue to keep said policies or an equal amount of insurance in force upon said property pending the sale thereof. In the event of the failure of second party to make the payments herein agreed to be made as and when the same shall be due, then second party shall, on demand made by the first party, pay to first party as and for her maintenance and support the sum required by this paragraph to be paid to third party, such payments to be in addition to the support and maintenance as provided in article fifth hereinafter set out.

"'It is further understood and agreed that until said property shall be sold, first party shall have the right to occupy same without the payment of rent or other charges, provided such sale shall have been consummated on or before the 1st day of January, 1929. If on said last-named date said real estate shall not have been sold and no earnest money contract for the sale thereof shall have been entered into between third party and a bona fide prospective purchaser thereof, then first party shall, upon request of second party, vacate said premises; and third party shall lease said premises for the best price obtainable, and such rental as may be by third party received therefrom shall be by him used and applied toward the payment of the mortgage interest, taxes and insurance hereinabove referred to; and after deducting for his services the usual and customary commission for leasing said property and collecting the rents therefrom, the balance, if any, then remains, shall be by said trustee paid over to first party as payment on account of the monthly payments referred to in article fifth hereof.

"'Third. When the above-mentioned real estate shall have been sold by third party, third party shall pay the costs of such sale, including all expenses for advertising said property which he may have theretofore advanced, together with an amount to compensate him for his services as trustee hereunder, equal to the usual and customary commission of real estate agents for the sale of real estate in the City of St. Louis, Missouri, and based on the selling price of said property. From the balance thus remaining third party shall reimburse second party for any and all sums advanced and paid out by second party subsequent to June 1, 1928, for mortgage interest, taxes, insurance, repairs or other disbursements for the benefit of said real estate. The net balance then remaining in the hands of third party shall be by him paid over to first party, one-half of such net balance representing the undivided one-half interest of first party in and to said real estate and the other half of said net balance representing payments in advance by second party to first party on account of the monthly payments referred to in paragraph five hereinafter mentioned, and first party shall at the time of receiving such advance payment execute and deliver to third party to be by him delivered to second party first party's receipt acknowledging payment from second party of such amount as payments in advance on said monthly payments referred to in said paragraph five. It is further understood and agreed, however, that if first party shall die or remarry prior to the sale of said house that said one-half of the net proceeds thereof which would have been paid over to first party as advance payments under paragraph five shall belong to and be paid over to second party.

"'Fourth. It is further understood and agreed that upon the execution of this instrument second party shall be and is hereby agreed to be the sole and exclusive owner of the personal property specified in the list hereto attached, marked "Schedule A" and made part of this agreement, it being understood and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • State ex rel. Green v. James
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • July 8, 1946
    ... ... the same to the court which may thereafter hear and determine ... all questions in respect to the divorce.' Dorsett v ... Dorsett, 232 Mo.App. 126, 90 S.W.2d 188, 194, quoted ... with approval in Bishop v. Bishop, Mo. App., 162 ... S.W.2d 332. Courts will ... ...
  • Luedde v. Luedde
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • May 18, 1948
    ... ... growing out of the marital relationship. Young v ... Thompson (Mo. App.), 290 S.W. 85; Dorsett v. Dorsett ... (Mo. App.), 90 S.W.2d 188; North v. North, 100 ... S.W.2d 582, 339 Mo. 1226, 109 A. L. R. 1061; Crenshaw v ... Crenshaw, 276 Mo ... ...
  • Gaede v. Smith
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • December 3, 1945
    ... ... the same to the court which may thereafter hear and determine ... all questions in respect to the divorce." Dorsett v ... Dorsett, 232 Mo.App. 126, 90 S.W.2d 188, quoted with ... approval in Bishop v. Bishop (Mo. App.), 162 S.W.2d ... 332. Courts will enforce ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT