Drisdel v. State, ED 103894

Decision Date07 February 2017
Docket NumberED 103894
Citation509 S.W.3d 860 (Mem)
Parties Leonardo DRISDEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

Kevin B. Gau, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.

Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leonardo Drisdel appeals from a denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Drisdel v. Lewis
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Missouri
    • March 31, 2021
    ...amended motion after an evidentiary hearing. The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the circuit court's judgment. See Drisdel v. State, 509 S.W.3d 860 (Mo. App. 2017). The appellate court issued its mandate on March 3, 2017.4 Petitioner filed a timely5 petition for writ of habeas corpus on ......
  • Mellinger v. Mellinger
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • February 7, 2017

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT