Drisdel v. State, ED 103894
Decision Date | 07 February 2017 |
Docket Number | ED 103894 |
Citation | 509 S.W.3d 860 (Mem) |
Parties | Leonardo DRISDEL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent. |
Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Kevin B. Gau, Assistant Public Defender, St. Louis, MO, for appellant.
Gregory L. Barnes, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Mary K. Hoff, J., and Lisa P. Page, J.
Leonardo Drisdel appeals from a denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Drisdel v. Lewis
...amended motion after an evidentiary hearing. The Missouri Court of Appeals affirmed the circuit court's judgment. See Drisdel v. State, 509 S.W.3d 860 (Mo. App. 2017). The appellate court issued its mandate on March 3, 2017.4 Petitioner filed a timely5 petition for writ of habeas corpus on ......
- Mellinger v. Mellinger