Drummond v. Inhabitants of Town of Manchester
| Decision Date | 31 August 1965 |
| Citation | 161 Me. 376,212 A.2d 701 |
| Parties | Guy V. DRUMMOND v. INHABITANTS OF TOWN OF MANCHESTER. |
| Court | Maine Supreme Court |
Sanford L. Fogg, Augusta, for appellant.
Seward B. Brewster, Augusta, for appellee.
Barnett I. Shur, Portland, amicus curiae.
Before WILLIAMSON, C. J., and WEBBER, TAPLEY, SULLIVAN, MARDEN and RUDMAN, JJ.
In 1964 plaintiff applied to the Municipal Officers of defendant town for a permit to establish and maintain upon his own property an automobile junkyard or grave-yard so-called. After notice and hearing the permit was denied. Plaintiff then brought a complaint in the nature of a petition for declaratory judgment seeking a declaration of his rights under and an interpretation of the pertinent statutes. (Now 30 M.R.S.A. §§ 2451 to 2458 inc.; formerly R.S.1954 Ch. 100, Secs. 137 to 144 inc. as amended). As of February 8, 1965 the justice below ordered summary judgment for the plaintiff on his complaint declaring that the 1964 permit should have been granted subject to and conditioned upon reasonable rules and regulations affecting operation imposed by defendant. An appeal was taken thereto.
Sec. 2452 provides in part that a permit, if granted, 'shall be valid only until the first day to the year following.' It follows that the permit for 1964, in issue here, would not be affected by our decision. Conditions change from year to year under which such permits are granted or denied by municipal officers. Changes are also wrought by legislative amendment. We note with interest the enactment of P.L.1965, Ch. 285 which amends the abovecited statutes and adds a new section 2451-B which contains a definition of 'automobile graveyard' not found in the original sections. It would be inappropriate for this court to give a purely advisory opinion with respect to a dead issue. The judgment below came too late and must be set aside. The case is moot.
Appeal dismissed.
SULLIVAN, J., sat at argument but retired before the opinion was adopted.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
National Hearing Aid Centers, Inc. v. Smith
...322 A.2d 320, 325 (Me.1974); cf. Hazzard v. Westview Golf Club, Inc., 217 A.2d 217, 224 (Me.1966); Drummond v. Inhabitants of Town of Manchester, 161 Me. 376, 212 A.2d 701 (1965). In determining justiciability we must ascertain whether the complaint alleged a claim of right justifying relie......
-
Berry v. Daigle
...or abstract propositions of law. Hazzard v. Westview Golf Club, Inc., Me., 217 A.2d 217, 224 (1966); Drummond v. Inhabitants of Town of Manchester, 161 Me. 376, 212 A.2d 701 (1965). The Declaratory Judgments Act does not create a new cause of action; it merely authorizes a new form of relie......
-
Lund ex rel. Wilbur v. Pratt
...questions or abstract propositions. Hazzard v. Westview Golf Club, Inc., 1966, Me., 217 A.2d 217 at 224; Drummond v. Inhabitants of Town of Manchester, 1965, 161 Me. 376, 212 A.2d 701. Is the action maintainable to compel the defendant to reimburse the town for the salary received for actin......
-
Lynch v. Town of Kittery
...be valid only until the first day of the year following"--in this instance, January 1, 1983.3 In Drummond v. Inhabitants of the Town of Manchester, 161 Me. 376, 212 A.2d 701 (1965) this Court dismissed an appeal brought in 1965 from denial of a junkyard permit on the grounds that it "came t......