Dubose v. Shelnutt, 90-1460

Decision Date13 September 1990
Docket NumberNo. 90-1460,90-1460
Parties15 Fla. L. Weekly D2315 Joseph R. DUBOSE, Jr., Petitioner, v. Mark SHELNUTT, Esquire, and David Eddy, Esquire, Respondents.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Joseph R. Dubose, Jr., Raiford, pro se.

David B. Eddy, Ocala, pro se.

Mark D. Shelnutt, Ocala, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Joseph R. Dubose petitions this court for a Writ of Mandamus seeking to compel Special Assistant Public Defenders Mark D. Shelnutt and David B. Eddy to produce the depositions of Howard Leary, Joseph Stanton and Clifford Kyler Brown relating to the completed circuit court and appellate proceedings in his case. See Bermed v. Tacher, 565 So.2d 833 (Fla.3d DCA 1990); Cf. Dennis v. Brummer, 479 So.2d 857 (Fla.3d DCA 1985). The attorneys responded to this petition by explaining that they did not immediately comply with Dubose's request because his letter failed to designate which witnesses' depositions Dubose wanted. This was confirmed by Dubose's letter, 1 which was attached to the attorneys' response. However, the attorneys' response was inadequate as they had a duty to furnish their former client with the requested documents. Rule 4-1.16(d) Rules of Professional Conduct. Having received the somewhat ambiguous request, the attorneys should have contacted Dubose to ascertain which depositions were desired. Accordingly, the Petition for Writ of Mandamus is granted and the attorneys are directed to furnish Dubose with the depositions, or copies thereof, of witnesses Howard Leary, John Stanton and Clifford Kyler Brown. Because the attorneys have indicated they will comply with Petitioner's request, we withhold issuance of the formal writ at this time.

GRANTED.

COBB, GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.

1 Dubose's letter stated: "Please send me all originals or copies of all the original depositions of the following witnesses from the above referenced case as soon as possible." The "following witnesses" were not identified.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Donahue v. Vaughn, 98-1750.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 23, 1998
    ...which have been paid for at public expense, as in Thompson v. Unterberger, 577 So.2d 684 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) and Dubose v. Shelnutt, 566 So.2d 921 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Although the Public Defender's Office is an agency which maintains public records which must be available for inspection und......
  • Colon v. Irwin, 98-2351.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • April 30, 1999
    ...613 So.2d 1372, 1373 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); Thompson v. Unterberger, 577 So.2d 684, 685-86 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991); Dubose v. Shelnutt, 566 So.2d 921 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Here, Colon seeks to have depositions prepared for trial that are not contained in the record of his criminal appeal. He is enti......
  • Woodson v. Durocher, 91-1554
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • October 24, 1991
    ...which have been paid for at public expense, as in Thompson v. Unterberger, 577 So.2d 684 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991) and Dubose v. Shelnutt, 566 So.2d 921 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Although the Public Defender's Office is an agency which maintains public records which must be available for inspection und......
  • Snowden v. Davis, 91-9
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 13, 1991
    ...copy, he may well be entitled to obtain it through other means; i.e., replevin filed in the circuit court. See Dubose v. Shelnutt, 566 So.2d 921 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Florida Rules of Professional Conduct 4-1.16(d). Our denial in this instance is without prejudice to Snowden to pursue other ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
  • Opinion 104: Surrender of File to the Client Upon Termination of the Representation
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 47-10, November 2018
    • Invalid date
    ...(Third) of the Law Governing Lawyers § 58(3), cmt. d (1998). [11] See also Colo. RPC 1.16A and 1.15A. [12] See Dubose v. Shelnutt, 566 So.2d 921 (Fla. Dist. Ct.App. 1990) (client request for "depositions of following witnesses" placed a duty on the lawyer to call the client and find out exa......
  • Formal Opinion 104: Surrender of Papers to the Client Upon Termination of the Representation
    • United States
    • Colorado Bar Association Colorado Lawyer No. 28-7, July 1999
    • Invalid date
    ...request for such papers and property. An ambiguous request should be met with some inquiry by the lawyer. See Dubose v. Shelnutt, 566 So.2d 921 (Fla.App. 5 Dist. 1990) (client request for "depositions of following witnesses" placed a duty on the lawyer to call the client and find out exactl......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT