Duckworth v. State
| Citation | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1289,469 So.2d 913 |
| Decision Date | 24 May 1985 |
| Docket Number | No. BA-97,BA-97 |
| Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1289 Douglas Berry DUCKWORTH, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Michael E. Allen, Public Defender, and Andrew Thomas, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Gregory C. Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.
The defendant pleaded nolo contendere to a violation of probation charge. He was adjudicated guilty of two counts of burglary and one count of grand theft. He was sentenced to two concurrent terms of 30 months incarceration. On this appeal, he urges error upon the denial of his motion to disqualify the trial judge pursuant to Rule 3.230, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure.
The defendant had previously appeared before the same judge upon an affidavit charging a violation of probation. The previous affidavit had been dismissed by the State because the victim had refused to testify out of fear. The defendant, prior to his entry of his plea of nolo contendere, filed a motion to disqualify the judge because of the judge's knowledge of the circumstances of the dismissal. The motion was denied. At the time of the entry of the nolo contendere plea, the defendant reserved the right to appeal the denial of his motion for disqualification of the judge.
The law is well established in this state that an Ashby 1 nolo plea is permissible only when the legal issue to be determined is dispositive of the case. Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla.1979). It is clear that a change of judicial personnel would not have disposed of the case.
Cases since Brown, supra, have consistently dismissed appeals where the issue sought to be reversed was not dispositive of the case. State v. Carr, 438 So.2d 826 (Fla.1983); Cauley v. State, 444 So.2d 964 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); Turner v. State, 429 So.2d 318 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Puccio v. State, 424 So.2d 85 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Hardison v. State, 385 So.2d 738 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.
MILLS and NIMMONS, JJ., and PEARSON, TILLMAN, (Ret.) Associate Judge, concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Starkes v. Sec'y
...a motion for disqualification is typically not appealable as it is generally not legally dispositive of the case. SeeDuckworth v. State, 469 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Defendant's pro se Motion for Disqualification was premised on his disapproval with the trial court's denial of his Mo......
-
Weber v. State, 85-2271
...court cannot reach the merits of an appeal if the issue on appeal was not dispositive below. See Carr, supra; Duckworth v. State, 469 So.2d 913 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985); D.K.G. v. State, 460 So.2d 549 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984); Banks v. State, 467 So.2d 386 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); Finney v. State, 420 So......
-
Blalock v. State, No. 1D19-3398
..., 731 So. 2d 46, 46 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (finding that a ruling on a motion to recuse is not dispositive and citing Duckworth v. State , 469 So. 2d 913 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), as holding the same); Vito v. State , 270 So. 3d 1287, 1288–89 (Fla. 1st DCA 2019) (acknowledging that the trial court ......
-
Silva v. State, 86-992
...which the defendant was facing. State v. Carr, 438 So.2d 826 (Fla.1983); Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 382 (Fla.1979); Duckworth v. State, 469 So.2d 913 (Fla.1985). ...