Dugway, Ltd. v. Fizzinoglia
| Decision Date | 25 October 1990 |
| Citation | 563 N.Y.S.2d 175,166 A.D.2d 836 |
| Parties | DUGWAY, LTD., Respondent, v. Frank FIZZINOGLIA, Appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
David Seth Michaels, Spencertown, for appellant.
Cade & Saunders (Stuart J. Justice, of counsel), Albany, for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court (Kahn, J.), entered January 26, 1990 in Albany County, which, inter alia, denied defendant's cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action.
Plaintiff owns a sizable portion of land in the Town of Austerlitz, Columbia County, which is presently in the process of being cleared and developed for the purpose of selling and constructing upscale homes on the property. In November 1989, plaintiff commenced this action apparently alleging nuisance, prima facie tort and intentional interference with contractual relations against defendant, its adjoining neighbor, and seeking injunctive and monetary relief. According to plaintiff, defendant deliberately and intentionally placed assorted debris and an uninhabitable trailer on his property in close proximity to the main entrance to plaintiff's property for no purpose other than to create an eyesore to both plaintiff and its potential customers in order to pressure plaintiff into selling another parcel of land to defendant at a deflated price. Following joinder of issue, plaintiff moved for a preliminary injunction. Defendant principally cross-moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action. Supreme Court denied both motions without opinion and this appeal by defendant ensued.
Defendant's cross motion to dismiss was improperly denied. Accepting the allegations in the complaint as true, as we must on a CPLR 3211 motion (see, Loftus, Inc. v. White, 150 A.D.2d 857, 859, 540 N.Y.S.2d 610), we conclude that the complaint fails to sufficiently state an articulable cause of action. The allegations in the complaint patently fail to make out a cause of action for intentional interference with precontractual business relations (see, Quail Ridge Assocs. v. Chemical Bank, 162 A.D.2d 917, 558 N.Y.S.2d 655; Susskind v. Ipco Hosp. Supply Corp., 49 A.D.2d 915, 373 N.Y.S.2d 627). Plaintiff's failure to allege special damages is fatal to any attempt to invoke the theory of prima facie tort (see, Quail Ridge Assocs. v. Chemical Bank, supra ). As for the theory of private nuisance, plaintiff has failed to sufficiently allege facts which would raise an inference that defendant's acts substantially interfered with plaintiff's use or enjoyment of the land (see, Queens County Business...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Romeo v. Sherry, 99-CV-7245 (NGG).
...substantial interference with a person's property right (even if placed intentionally). See e.g. Dugway, Ltd. v. Fizzinoglia, 166 A.D.2d 836, 837, 563 N.Y.S.2d 175, 176-177 (3d Dep't.1990) (holding that plaintiff could not pursue an action for private nuisance against an adjoining landowner......
-
Nalley v. General Elec. Co.
...but certain and substantial, and must interfere with the physical comfort of the ordinary reasonable person" (Dugway v. Fizzinoglia, 166 A.D.2d 836, 563 N.Y.S.2d 175 [Third Dept., The Court has examined the depositions of the various parties. There is much testimony with respect to activiti......
-
Bd. of Managers of Morton Square Condo. v. Eqr 600 Wash., L.L.C.
...annoyance or discomfort to the ordinary reasonable person, and more than mere discomfort or minor inconvenience (Dugway, Ltd. v. Fizzinoglia, 166 A.D.2d 836 [3d Dept 1990]). Nuisance is characterized by a pattern of continuity or recurrence of objectionable conduct. Domen Holding Co. v. Ara......
-
McNeary v. Niagara Mohawk Power Corp.
...would raise an inference that defendant's acts substantially interfered with plaintiff's use or enjoyment of the land" (Dugway Ltd. v Fizzinoglia, 166 A.D.2d 836, 837 [emphasis in original]). "[I]n order to establish nuisance the inconvenience and interference complained of must not be 'fan......