Duncan v. Entrekin
| Decision Date | 14 February 1955 |
| Docket Number | No. 18794,18794 |
| Parties | Corvin DUNCAN et al. v. Herbert Lee ENTREKIN, Sr, et al. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Joseph B. McConnell, Ernest Bostick, Atlanta, for plaintiffs in error.
Thomas O. Davis, James A. Mackay, Decatur, for defendants in error.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court.
This is a suit to enjoin the operation of a kindergarten in an unincorporated part of DeKalb County which was zoned as a residential district in 1946. At an interlocutory hearing the judge refused to grant a temporary injunction and the exception is to that judgment. Held: All portions of DeKalb County lying outside the limits of incorporated areas were, on May 23, 1946, zoned as industrial, commercial, apartment, and residential districts. The parties own adjacent property in a residential district. A 'Residential District' is defined by the zoning ordinance of 1946 as being 'all areas formerly zoned by the Commissioner of Roads and Revenues of DeKalb County for residential purposes and also all properties now occupied or used for residential purposes, and including churches, schools, agriculture, nurseries, clubs, parks and all buildings and uses of buildings and land incidental thereto,' but exclusive of buildings, structures, and uses of buildings and lands included in districts zoned for industrial, commercial or apartment use. The evidence shows that the defendants occupy their residence as a home and that they have also used it for kindergarten purposes since 1948, and it is clear to us that such use of it is entirely permissible under the provisions of DeKalb County's zoning ordinance of 1946. A kindergarten is a school for children of very tender years, and a school is one of the permissive uses of property in a 'Residential District,' as that term is defined by the county's zoning ordinance of 1946. Since statutes or ordinances which restrict an owner's right to freely use his property for any lawful purpose are in derogation of the common law, they must be strictly construed and never extended beyond their plain and explicit terms. Foster v. Vickery, 202 Ga. 55, 60, 42 S.E.2d 117, and citations. The question which this case presents for decision was also raised by the petition in Shoaf v. Bland, 208 Ga. 709, 69 S.E.2d 258, but at an interlocutory hearing of that case the plaintiff abandoned his contention that a kindergarten could not be operated lawfully in an unincorporated part of DeKalb County which...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Possekel v. O'Donnell
...was held not to be a "school" where that term was not limited in any way. 3 To the contrary, the court in Duncan v. Entrekin (1955), 211 Ga. 311, 85 S.E.2d 771 held that the use of a home for kindergarten purposes was permissible under a zoning ordinance permitting "schools" in a residentia......
-
Evans Timber Co. v. Central of Ga. R. Co.
...Statutes in derogation of common law must be strictly construed and never extended beyond plain and explicit terms. Duncan v. Entrekin, 211 Ga. 311, 312, 85 S.E.2d 771 (1955); see also Fayette County v. Seagraves, 245 Ga. 196, 197-198, 264 S.E.2d 13 (1980). Thus, preemption of the common la......
-
DeKalb County v. Post Apartment Homes
...the common law, they must be strictly construed and never extended beyond their plain and explicit terms. [Cits.]" Duncan v. Entrekin, 211 Ga. 311, 312, 85 S.E.2d 771 (1955); accord Fayette County v. Seagraves, 245 Ga. 196, 197-198, 264 S.E.2d 13 (1980). Since the exercise of police power i......
-
Tuggle v. Manning, 24422
...construed in favor of the landowner. City of Rome v. Shadyside etc. Gardens, 93 Ga.App. 759, 763, 92 S.E.2d 734, 736; Duncan v. Entrekin, 211 Ga. 311, 85 S.E.2d 771.' Hopping v. Cobb County Fair Asso., Inc., 222 Ga. 704, 705, 152 S.E.2d Although a zoning ordinance may not be per se invalid,......
-
Statutes in Derogation of the Common Law in the Georgia Supreme Court - R. Perry Sentell, Jr.
...v. Hancock, 105 Ga. 185, 31 S.E. 419 (1898); Denson v. Peoples Bank, 186 Ga. 619, 198 S.E. 666 (1938). 46. See, e.g., Duncan v. Entrekin, 211 Ga. 311, 85 S.E.2d 771 (1955); Fayette County v. Seagraves, 245 Ga. 196, 264 S.E.2d 13 (1980); Bo Fancy Prods., Inc. v. Rabun County Bd. of Comm'rs, ......