Dunn v. Jackson
Decision Date | 01 June 1921 |
Docket Number | (No. 228-3404.) |
Parties | DUNN v. JACKSON. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Habeas corpus proceedings by J. T. Jackson to recover from Mrs. L. A. Dunn the custody of his minor child. Judgment for plaintiff was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals (212 S. W. 959), and defendant brings error. Judgments of Court of Civil Appeals and of district court reversed, and cause remanded for new trial.
R. R. Taylor, of Jefferson, for plaintiff in error.
Schluter & Singleton, of Jefferson, for defendant in error.
This habeas corpus proceeding was instituted by J. T. Jackson to regain the custody of his minor child, Annie Jackson, from the custody of the child's maternal grandmother. The father was awarded custody of the child, and from this order respondent appealed to the Court of Civil Appeals, which court affirmed the judgment of the trial court. 212 S. W. 959.
The findings of fact and conclusions of law by the trial court are as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sears v. Davis
...A significant fact is that the Supreme Court refused a writ of error. To precisely the same effect was the later decision in Dunn v. Jackson, 231 S. W. 351, an opinion by the Commission of Appeals, expressly approved by the Supreme Court. The last decision, it seems to us, entirely fails to......
-
Swift v. Swift
...4 (writ refused); Haymond v. Haymond, 74 Tex. 414, 421, 12 S. W. 90; Legate v. Legate, 87 Tex. 248, 252, 28 S. W. 281; Dunn v. Jackson (Tex. Com. App.) 231 S. W. 351, 353, par. 2; Smith v. Smith (Tex. Civ. App.) 200 S. W. 1129, 1131, par. 5; Boyd v. Boyd (Tex. Civ. App.) 157 S. W. 254, 256,......
-
Hardy v. McCulloch
...duly considered, and such rights are determined and fixed by the judgment rendered therein. Legate v. Legate, supra; Dunn v. Jackson (Tex. Com. App.) 231 S. W. 351, 353. A judgment in such a case, determining and fixing the rights of the parties litigant to the custody of a minor child, is ......
-
Taylor v. Meek
...custody. We do not believe this statement of the law correctly interprets the reasoning of the following line of cases: Dunn v. Jackson, Tex.Com.App., 231 S.W. 351; Duckworth v. Thompson, Tex.Com.App., 1931, 37 S.W.2d 731; Sawyer v. Bezner, Tex.Civ.App., 204 S.W.2d 19, writ of error refused......