Dupree v. Plantation Pointe, LP
Decision Date | 09 December 2004 |
Docket Number | No. 2002-CT-00556-SCT.,2002-CT-00556-SCT. |
Citation | 892 So.2d 228 |
Parties | Shelia DUPREE, Individually, and as Conservator of the Person and Estate of Annie Sanders v. PLANTATION POINTE, L.P. d/b/a The Windsor Place. |
Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Tylvester Otis Goss, Jackson, Constance Slaughter Harvey, Forest, attorneys for appellant.
James P. Streetman, III, Brian Douglas Mayo, Wade G. Manor, Ridgeland, attorneys for appellee.
EN BANC.
ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI
¶ 1. Shelia Dupree sued Plantation Pointe, L.P. d/b/a The Windsor Place (Windsor Place), individually and on the behalf of her mother, Annie Sanders, after Sanders was sexually assaulted at Windsor Place nursing home, a business of Plantation Pointe. The trial court granted a directed verdict on Dupree's individual claim for mental and emotional damages. A jury verdict was returned in favor of Windsor Place on the remaining claims, and the trial court entered judgment for Windsor Place. After denial of the Dupree's motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict and motion for new trial, Dupree appealed.
¶ 2. Dupree raised three issues before the Court of Appeals:
¶ 3. A divided Court of Appeals affirmed in part, reversed in part and remanded in part the circuit court's judgment. Dupree v. Plantation Pointe, L.P., 881 So.2d 832 (Miss.Ct.App.2003). The Court of Appeals affirmed the trial court's dismissal of Dupree's claim for mental and emotional damages. However, the Court of Appeals found that the trial court abused its discretion in denying Dupree's motion for a new trial on the remaining issues and reversed and remanded for a new trial on the remaining issues. The Court of Appeals declined to address the issue regarding jury instructions.
¶ 4. Windsor Place filed for certiorari claiming that the Court of Appeals erred in reversing and remanding the case for a new trial. As will be discussed, this Court reverses that decision by the Court of Appeals and reinstates and affirms the judgment based on the verdict and affirms the trial court's decision to deny the motion for new trial.
¶ 6. Following the verdict, Dupree moved for JNOV or in the alternative a new trial. Because the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court based on its decision to deny a new trial, this opinion focuses on the motion for a new trial as opposed to the denial of JNOV.
¶ 7. Motions for a new trial are made pursuant to Rule 59. Trial courts have authority to grant a new trial, where, in the exercise of their sound discretion, they regard such a verdict as being contrary to the substantial weight of the evidence. C & C Trucking Co. v. Smith, 612 So.2d 1092, 1099 (Miss.1992). A denial of a request for new trial will be reversed only when such denial amounts to a abuse of that judge's discretion. Maxwell v. Ill. Cent. Gulf R.R., 513 So.2d 901, 908 (Miss.1987). This Court "should give substantial weight, deference and respect to the decision of the trial judge in matters such as this." C & C Trucking Co., 612 So.2d at 1099.
¶ 8. In finding that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion for a new trial, the Court of Appeals stated:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Howard v. Estate of Harper ex rel. Harper
...under general principles of tort law for negligent acts or omissions regarding the care of its residents. See Dupree v. Plantation Pointe, L.P., 892 So.2d 228, 235 (Miss.2004) (sufficient evidence existed to support a jury's finding that nursing home was not negligent in treatment and prote......
-
Miss. Valley Silica Co. v. Barnett
...... at 908 (¶ 28) (citing Dupree v. Plantation Pointe L.P. , 892 So.2d 228, 232, 235 (Miss.2004) ). 15 For the applicable standards ......
-
Coho Resources, Inc. v. Chapman
...their sound discretion, they regard such a verdict as being contrary to the substantial weight of the evidence. Dupree v. Plantation Pointe, L.P., 892 So.2d 228, 232 (Miss.2004) (citing C&C Trucking Co. v. Smith, 612 So.2d 1092, 1099 (Miss.1992)). A denial of a request for new trial will be......
-
Dependable Abrasives, Inc. v. Pierce
...or when the jury has departed from its oath and its verdict is a result of bias, passion, and prejudice.” Dupree v. Plantation Pointe, L.P., 892 So.2d 228, 235 (Miss.2004) (citing Griffin v. Fletcher, 362 So.2d 594, 596 (Miss.1978) ). This Court, “[w]hen reviewing a denial of a motion for a......