Dycus v. State, 93-00509
| Decision Date | 17 December 1993 |
| Docket Number | No. 93-00509,93-00509 |
| Citation | 629 So.2d 275 |
| Parties | 18 Fla. L. Weekly D2680 Charles DYCUS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and John S. Lynch, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Ronald Napolitano, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.
The trial court correctly denied the appellant's motion to suppress evidence; therefore, we affirm the appellant's conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine. However, we strike special conditions of probation numbers (4) and (7) because they were not orally announced at sentencing and the appellant had no opportunity to object to their imposition. See Gregory v. State, 616 So.2d 174 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993).
To continue reading
Request your trial
2 cases
- Russell v. State
-
Tomlinson v. State, 92-03528
...court failed to announce it in open court, preventing appellant from having the opportunity to object to its imposition. Dycus v. State, 629 So.2d 275 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). PARKER and LAZZARA, JJ., ...