Easterlin v. Easterlin
Decision Date | 21 November 1911 |
Citation | 56 So. 688,62 Fla. 468 |
Parties | EASTERLIN v. EASTERLIN. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Alachua County; J. T. Wills, Judge.
Action by Juanita Easterlin, by her next friend, Joe O'Bannon against Ada Easterlin, administratrix. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.
Syllabus by the Court
At the common law the marriage of a man and the birth of a child subsequent to the making of a will by him had the effect of revoking such will, but, when the will was made by a man already married, the birth of a child subsequent to the making of the will did not work a revocation of such will. In the absence of a statute, this principle of the common law must be held to be the law in this state.
COUNSEL Chris Matheson, for appellant.
E. C F. Sanchez and W. E. Baker, for appellee.
Juanita Easterlin, by her next friend, Joe O'Bannon, filed her petition in the county judge's court, sitting as a court of probate, in and for Alachua county, in which she alleged that George W. Easterlin, her father, on the 12th day of January, 1909, executed a certain instrument in writing purporting to be his last will and testament, and afterwards on the 16th day of December, 1910, departed this life leaving as his heirs at law and legal representatives the petitioner and Mrs. Bessie Godwin, his daughters, and Ada Easterlin, his widow. It is further alleged therein that the testator bequeathed and devised all of his estate, both real and personal, to his daughter Bessie Godwin, Ada Easterlin, his widow, and to Callie Easterlin Fournia, his niece, leaving nothing to the petitioner, and making no provision for her whatever. The petition further alleges that the petitioner was born on the 28th day of July, 1910, after the making of the will, by reason of which fact, coupled with the further fact that no provision was made in the will for the petitioner, it is claimed that such instrument, purporting to be the last will and testament of George W. Easterlin, deceased, was 'revoked by act of law, and therefore null and void.' It is further alleged that such instrument was admitted to probate on the 22d day of December, 1910, and that letters testamentary were issued to Ada Easterlin, the person appointed in such instrument as the executrix thereof. The petitioner prayed for a revocation of the will and for general relief. A copy of the will was attached to the petition as an exhibit and made a part thereof. We copy the following paragraphs of such will:
To this petition Ada Easterlin, as executrix, interposed a demurrer upon the following grounds:
'(1) That there is no sufficient ground alleged in said petition for revoking the will of the said George W. Easterlin.
'(2)...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Burns v. Burns
...570, 41 Va. 570; Ellis' Ex'rs, v. Ellis' Widow, 2 Desaus, S.C., 556; In re Hatfield's Estate, 153 Fla. 817, 16 So.2d 57; Easterlin v. Easterlin, 62 Fla. 468, 56 So. 688, Ann.Cas.1813D, 1316; Ordish v. McDermott, 2 Redf., N.Y., 460; In re Rendell's Estate, 244 Mich. 197, 221 N.W. 116; In re ......
-
Estate of Keeven, Matter of
...child or marriage alone in the case of a woman, after execution of a will resulted in revocation of the entire will. Easterlin v. Easterlin, 62 Fla. 468, 56 So. 688 (1911). The contemplation of marriage exception developed to avoid the unfairness to other beneficiaries where it was obvious ......
-
R.I. Hosp. Trust Co. v. Hail
...of Florida a child who is not provided for by his father in his will is not entitled to share in the father's estate. Easterlin v. Easterlin, 62 Fla. 468, 56 So. 688, Ann. Cas. 1913 D, 1316. Said section 24, in order "to give effect to the testator's intention regarding that part of his est......
-
Estate of Ganier
...child or marriage alone in the case of a woman, after execution of a will resulted in revocation of the entire will. Easterlin v. Easterlin, 62 Fla. 468, 56 So. 688 (1911). The contemplation of marriage exception developed to avoid the unfairness to other beneficiaries where it was obvious ......