Edmunds v. Edmunds
| Decision Date | 11 December 2009 |
| Docket Number | No. 23A09.,23A09. |
| Citation | 686 S.E.2d 150 |
| Parties | Donald P. EDMUNDS v. Phyllis M. EDMUNDS. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
The McGougan Law Firm, by Paul J. Ekster and Dennis T. Worley, Tabor City, for plaintiff-appellee.
The Odom Firm, PLLC, by Thomas L. Odom, Jr. and David W. Murray, Charlotte; and Williamson, Walton & Scott, LLP, by Benton H. Walton, III and C. Martin Scott, II, Whiteville, for defendant-appellant.
AFFIRMED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
3 cases
- In re J.D.B.
-
Nelson v. Bennett, COA09-896.
...general plan of the testat[rix]. Edmunds v. Edmunds, 194 N.C.App. 425, 433, 669 S.E.2d 874, 879 (2008), aff'd per curiam, 363 N.C. 740, 686 S.E.2d 150 (2009) (quoting 694 S.E.2d 775 Pittman v. Thomas, 307 N.C. 485, 492, 299 S.E.2d 207, 211 (1983) (internal quotations omitted)). “ ‘The inten......
-
TE v. State (In re AAAE)
...thus without standing to appeal to this court."); Edmunds v. Edmunds , 194 N.C.App. 425, 669 S.E.2d 874, 878 (2008), aff'd , 363 N.C. 740, 686 S.E.2d 150 (2009) ("In general, only a party or his legal representative has standing to request that an order be set aside under Rule 60(b); a stra......