Edwards v. California Chemical Co., 69-695
Citation | 245 So.2d 259 |
Decision Date | 19 February 1971 |
Docket Number | No. 69-695,69-695 |
Parties | Ivy EDWARDS, Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA CHEMICAL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, and Hector Supply Co., a Florida corporation, Appellees. |
Court | Court of Appeal of Florida (US) |
Maurice Fixel of Meyer, Leben, Fixel & Gaines, Hollywood, for appellant.
Michael D. Sikes of Sherouse, Corlett, Merritt, Killian & Okell, Miami, for appellee-California Chemical.
Thomas J. Schulte and David L. Willing of Dean, Adams, George & Wood, Miami, for appellee-Hector Supply Co.
This negligence case was terminated in the trial court by entry of summary judgment against the plaintiff. He appeals. We reverse because of the existence of genuine issues of material fact that preclude summary disposition. 1
A summary judgment review of the record 2 reveals that plaintiff, an illiterate, labored at the Boca Raton Hotel and Country Club taking care of the golf course grounds. He become ill from arsenic poisoning following use of Ortho Standard Lead Arsenate. This product was manufactured by the defendant, California Chemical Co., and was sold and distributed by the defendant, Hector Supply Co.
Lead arsenate is highly toxic. It can be absorbed into the body by inhalation, contact with unbroken skin and digestion. To safely use the product the user must wear protective clothing and employ a respirator.
The gravamen of plaintiff's complaint and the crux of this appeal centers upon the defendant's failure to warn the plaintiff of the necessity for a user to employ a respirator and protective rubber or neoprene clothing. More particularly, we must decide if the warning contained upon the product's label was a sufficient warning as a matter of law so as to entitle defendants to summary judgment.
On one side of the bag containing the lead arsenate were printed lengthy and
specific instructions for use as an insecticide as concerns its application to various agricultural crops including that of lawns and golf greens, as follows:
ORTHOR STANDARD LEAD ARSENATE
READ ENTIRE LABEL.USE STRICTLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH CAUTIONS, WARNINGS AND DIRECTIONS, AND WITH APPLICABLE STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS.USES,TIMINGS AND DOSAGE MAY VARY AS A CONSEQUENCE OF LOCAL WEATHER OR CONDITIONS;WE RECOMMEND REFERENCE TO LOCAL AGRICULTURAL AUTHORITIES CONCERNING SPECIFIC USEAGE.
Official recommendations for the use and dosage of Lead Arsenate vary in different sections. Use ORTHO Standard Lead Arsenate according to the standard practices in your locality for the control of those insects against which Lead Arsenate is effective. The following general direction are suggested as a guide for the use of this material.
APPLES, PEARS, QUINCES: Codling Moth, Leafrollers, Plum Curculio, Tent Caterpillars--Use 3 lbs. to 100 gals. water for Calyx and cover sprays. For Apple Maggot-Use 2 lbs. per 100 gals. Consult your ORTHO Fieldman or your local Agricultural Authority in regard to the number and dates of applications. California Oak Moth, Red Humped Caterpillar and Tent Caterpillar-Use 3 to 4 lbs. to 100 gals. water when insects first attack foliage.
CHERRIES (Eastern States): Cherry Maggot--2 1/2 lbs. to 100 gals. water. Apply according to local recommendations.
2. Because critical, unforseeable factors beyond the manufacturer's control prevent it from eliminating all risks in connection with the use of chemicals even though reasonably fit for such use, buyer and user acknowledge and assume all risks and liability (except those assumed by the manufacturer under 1 above) resulting from handling, storage, and use of this material. These risks include, but are not limited to, damage to plants, crops and animals to which the material is applied, failure to control pests, damage caused by drift to other plants or crops, and personal injury. Buyer and user accept and use this material on these conditions, whether or not such use is in accordance with directions. FORM 6158-D' (A3841)
The product was labeled on the other side, as concerns its warning of danger, as follows:
DIRECTIONS ON BACK
NET WEIGHT Completely empty Bag and dispose of
4 POUNDS waste pesticide by burying. Burn bag
immediately and stay out of smoke.
Residue and ashes from burned bags
must also be buried.
NOTE: OPINION CONTAINS TABLE OR OTHER DATA THAT IS NOT VIEWABLE
As can be seen--this without dispute--there was no warning or indication upon the label that a respirator and protective clothing were required for safe use.
It is clear that manufacturers and sellers of inherently dangerous products have a duty to give users a fair and adequate warning of its dangerous potentialities. 3 And clearly plaintiff was within a class who would foreseeably use the product and be harmed in the absence of adequate warning.
Turning to the warning...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Cooley v. Carter-Wallace Inc., CARTER-WALLACE
...Products, Inc., 88 N.M. 74, 537 P.2d 682, 691 human consumption of hogs fed grain treated with disinfectant]; Edwards v. California Chemical Co., Fla.App., 245 So.2d 259, 265, cert. den. Fla., 247 So.2d 440 Reiger v. Toby Enters., 45 Or.App. 679, 609 P.2d 402, 404 Spencer v. Nelson Sales Co......
-
Vic Potamkin Chevrolet, Inc. v. Horne
...either because of its inherently dangerous nature, see, e.g., Tampa Drug Co. v. Wait, 103 So.2d 603 (Fla.1958); Edwards v. California Chem. Co., 245 So.2d 259 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 247 So.2d 440 (Fla.1971), or because the product was defective, see, e.g., Walker v. National Gun Trad......
-
Brown v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.
...the instructions are not followed. See Panther Oil & Grease Mfg. Co. v. Segerstrom, 224 F.2d 216 (9th Cir.1955); Edwards v. California Chemical Co., 245 So.2d 259 (Fla.App.1971); McCully v. Fuller Brush Co., 68 Wash.2d 675, 415 P.2d 7 (1966); Bean v. Ross Mfg. Co., 344 S.W.2d 18 (Mo.1961). ......
-
Hill v. Husky Briquetting, Inc.
...Liability: Directions for Use and the Duty to Warn.6 Accord: Tampa Drug Co. v. Wait, 103 So.2d 603 (Fla.1958); Edwards v. California Chemical Co., 245 So.2d 259 (Fla.App.1971), and Thomas v. Arvon Products Co., 424 Pa. 365, 227 A.2d 897 ...