Empire Distributors of North Carolina, Inc. v. North Carolina Alcoholic Beverage Control Com'n

Decision Date05 May 1987
Docket NumberNo. 8610SC1179,8610SC1179
PartiesEMPIRE DISTRIBUTORS OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC., Petitioner-Appellant, v. NORTH CAROLINA ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellee, and Fetzer Vineyards, Inc., Respondent-Intervenor-Appellee.
CourtNorth Carolina Court of Appeals

Murchison, Guthrie & Davis by Dennis L. Guthrie, Charlotte and Bauer, Deitch & Raines by Gilbert H. Deitch, Atlanta, for petitioner-appellant.

David S. Crump, Raleigh, for respondent-appellee.

Maupin, Taylor, Ellis & Adams by Armistead J. Maupin, Charles B. Neely, Jr. and M. Keith Kapp, Raleigh, for respondent-intervenor-appellee.

ARNOLD, Judge.

Petitioner contends that the trial court erred in dismissing its action by holding that the ABC Commission lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter in this case.

In its petition filed with the ABC Commission, Empire asked for the following relief.

1. For a hearing on Fetzer Vineyards, Inc. appointment of Prestige Wines, Inc. as its representative in the Charlotte-Mecklenburg marketing area and its termination of the statutory granted wholesale distribution agreement with Empire.

2. For official notification from the North Carolina Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission to Fetzer Vineyards, Inc. notifying it that pursuant to § 18B-1200 et seq. the distribution agreement between Fetzer Vineyards, Inc. and Empire shall continue in effect pending the Commission's decision and any judicial review.

3. For a Pre-Hearing conference pursuant to Title 4, Subchapter 2R, Section .0810 of the North Carolina Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission Rules.

G.S. 18B-1205(d) states:

Upon receiving a written request from the winery or wholesaler for a hearing the Commission shall, after notice and hearing, determine if the wholesaler has rectified the conditions or if good cause exists for the amendment, termination, cancellation, or nonrenewal of the agreement, as appropriate.

This statute expressly gives authority to the ABC Commission to conduct a hearing on the contract dispute presently before this Court.

The statute also directly spells out what the status of a contract shall be while under review by both the agency and the judiciary. G.S. 18B-1205(d) states:

In any case in which a petition is made to the Commission for such a determination, the agreement in question shall continue in effect, pending the Commission's decision and any judicial review thereof.

Petitioner asked only for what the statute...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • EMPIRE DISTRIBUTORS OF NC v. Schieffelin & Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of North Carolina
    • January 19, 1988
    ...only one published state court judicial opinion that construes any part of the Act. Empire Distribs., Inc. v. North Carolina Alcohol Beverage Control Comm'n, 85 N.C.App. 528, 355 S.E.2d 524 (1987) (ABC Commission has subject matter jurisdiction to hear contract dispute between distributor a......
  • Empire Distributors of North Carolina, Inc. v. Schieffelin & Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit
    • October 20, 1988
    ...of the petition filed by Empire. See N.C.Gen.Stat. Sec. 18B-1205(d); Empire Distributors of North Carolina, Inc. v. North Carolina Alcoholic Beverage Control Commission, 85 N.C.App. 528, 355 S.E.2d 524 (1987) (In an unrelated case, the Court of Appeals of North Carolina held that a distribu......
  • Bridges v. Bridges
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • May 5, 1987
    ... ... No. 863DC976 ... Court of Appeals of North Carolina ... May 5, 1987 ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT