Englander Co. v. Kennedy
| Decision Date | 29 May 1968 |
| Docket Number | No. B--830,B--830 |
| Citation | 428 S.W.2d 806 |
| Parties | The ENGLANDER CO., Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. Jack G. KENNEDY, Respondent. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Brame & Brame, M. S. Brame, Sherman, Cervin & Stanford, Paul H. Stanford, Dallas, for petitioners.
Carl McLynn, Sherman, for respondent.
In this case the trial court rendered judgment for the plaintiff and made findings of fact and conclusions of law in support of its judgment. On appeal to the court of civil appeals, defendant, Englander Co., contended that a vital fact finding of the trial court was not supported by the evidence. The court of civil appeals affirmed. 424 S.W.2d 305. Two of the defendants have filed applications for writs of error in this court.
In perfecting the record for appeal, the defendants requested and filed only a partial statement of facts consisting of documentary evidence admitted at the trial. Some of the documents admitted at the trial were not designated by the defendants to be included in the statement of facts, but these were included at the request of the plaintiff. No party requested that other evidence taken at the trial be transcribed into the statement of facts. The plaintiff did not stipulate that the partial statement of facts constituted an agreed statement. Tex.Rules Civ.Proc. 375, 377, and 378. The court of civil appeals held that We approve the holding of the court of civil appeals although Tex.Rules Civ.Proc. 377(c) has been interpreted as requiring a different result. See Advisory Opinions of the Subcommittee on Interpretation of the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure, 5 Tex.B.J. 236 (1942), 5 Tex.B.J. 428 (1942), 8 Tex.B.J. 17 (1945), 8 Tex.B.J. 27 (1945); and Stayton. Analysis of Texas Changes, 4 Tex.B.J. 667 (1941).
The burden is upon a party appealing from a trial court judgment to show that the judgment is erroneous in order to obtain a reversal. When the complaint is that the evidence is factually or legally insufficient to support vital findings of fact, or that the evidence conclusively refutes vital findings, this burden cannot be discharged in the absence of a complete or an agreed...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Bradley, Matter of
...proof. See Bland, 810 S.W.2d at 283; Englander Co. v. Kennedy, 424 S.W.2d 305, 308 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas), writ ref'd per curiam, 428 S.W.2d 806 (Tex.1968). A homestead disclaimer cannot "change the character of the true homestead." City Central Bank & Trust Co. v. Byrne, 47 S.W.2d 432, 434......
-
In re Moody
...homestead property free and clear of judgment liens. Englander v. Kennedy, 424 S.W.2d 305 (Tex.Civ.App.— Dallas) writ ref'd n.r.e., 428 S.W.2d 806 (Tex.1968). 21. The provisions of the bankruptcy code contained within 11 U.S.C. § 541 provide that upon commencement of a case, all property of......
-
Sanchez v. Telles
...810 S.W.2d at 285; see also Englander Co. v. Kennedy, 424 S.W.2d 305, 308-09 (Tex.Civ.App.--Dallas, writ ref'd n.r.e. per curiam ), 428 S.W.2d 806 (Tex.1968). Possession and use of land by one who owns it and who resides upon it makes it the homestead in law and in fact. Carpenter, 849 S.W.......
-
Southwestern Bell Tel. Co. v. Thomas
...review, it is not sufficient when objected to. This is especially true when a 'no evidence' point is presented. See Englander Co v. Kennedy, 428 S.W.2d 806 (Tex.Sup.1968). The appellant Southwestern Bell Telephone Company has used due diligence to obtain a statement of facts. After the stat......