Engle v. Jones
| Decision Date | 31 January 1873 |
| Citation | 51 Mo. 316 |
| Parties | JOSEPH ENGLE, Respondent, v. GARSHAM B. JONES, Appellant. |
| Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Polk Circuit Court.
McAffee and Phelps, for Appellants, cited: Logan vs. Small, 43 Mo., 254; Franz vs. Hilterbrand, 45 Mo., 121; McKeon vs. Citizens Railway, 42 Mo., 80; (latter clause on page 88.)
J. P. Ellis, for Respondent, cited: Allred vs. Bray, 41 Mo., 485; Franz vs. Hilterbrand, 45 Mo., 122; Walker vs. Borland, 21 Mo., 289; Goetz vs. Ambs, 27 Mo., 31; Friedenheit vs. Edmonson, 36 Mo., 230.
We have seen nothing objectionable in the record, except in the ruling of the court, in reference to the question of damages. The other points were all fairly submitted, and the jury were the proper judges to pass upon them.
The action was in trespass for taking and converting two horses belonging to the plaintiff, and the court instructed the jury that if they found for the plaintiff, they should assess his damages at the actual value of the property when taken, unless the same was taken maliciously or wantonly, and in that case they might assess damages by way of smart money. No witness placed the value of the horses higher than one hundred and eighty dollars, and the jury returned a verdict for three hundred dollars.
As an abstract proposition of law the instruction was correct, but the objection to it is, there was no evidence in the case justifying it. No aggravating circumstances were disclosed calling forth the rule applicable to vindictive damages. Unless the trespass is committed in a wanton, rude or aggravated manner, indicating oppression, malice or a desire to injure, the damages should be compensatory only. (Franz vs. Hilterbrand, et. al., 45 Mo., 121.)
As the evidence wholly failed to show any of these elements, the judgment should be reversed, and the cause remanded.
The other Judges concurring.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Spitzengel v. Greenlease Motor Car Co.
...Mo.App. 1233, 87 S.W.2d 1045, 1049; Jeck v. O'Meara, 122 S.W.2d 897; Griffin v. Petree, 226 Mo.App. 718, 724, 46 S.W.2d 609, 612; Engel v. Jones, 51 Mo. 316; Franz Hilterbrand, 45 Mo. 121, 123; Summers v. Keller, 152 Mo.App. 626, 634, 133 S.W. 1180, 1182; Hall v. S. L. & S. F. Ry. Co., 224 ......
-
Peak v. Taubman
... ... before he could recover. Callahan v. Ingram, 122 Mo ... 371; Tilles v. Publishing Co., 241 Mo. 642; ... Jones v. Murray, 167 Mo. 47; Ickenroth v ... Transit Co., 102 Mo.App. 615; Fulkerson v ... Murdock, 53 Mo.App. 151; Arnold v. Company, 76 ... Supreme [251 Mo. 430] Court on the question in the cases of ... Franz v. Hilterbrand, 45 Mo. 121; Engle v ... Jones, 51 Mo. 316; Graham v. Railroad, 66 Mo ... 536; Seibel v. Siemon, 72 Mo. 526; Bruce v ... Ulery, 79 Mo. 322; Brown v. Plank ... ...
-
Peak v. Taubman
...irreconcilable with the more recent rulings of the Supreme Court on the question in the cases of Franz v. Hilterbrand, 45 Mo. 121; Engle v. Jones, 51 Mo. 316; Graham v. Railroad, 66 Mo. 536; Seibel v. Siemon, 72 Mo. 526; Bruce v. Ulery, 79 Mo. 322; Brown v. Plank Road Co., 89 Mo. 152 ; Wels......
-
Carson v. Smith
...to award exemplary damages, not only to compensate the sufferer, but to punish the offender. Franz v. Hilterbrand, 45 Mo. 121; Engle v. Jones, 51 Mo. 316; Morgan Durfee, 69 Mo. 469; Bruce v. Ulery, 79 Mo. 322; Brown v. Plank Road Co., 89 Mo. 152, 1 S.W. 129; Fulkerson v. Murdock, 53 Mo.App.......