Envases Venezolanos, S.A. v. Collazo
Decision Date | 13 March 1990 |
Docket Number | No. 89-1106,89-1106 |
Parties | 15 Fla. L. Weekly D691 ENVASES VENEZOLANOS, S.A., et al., Appellants, v. Enrique COLLAZO, et al., Appellees. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Nortman & Bloom and George Volsky, for appellants.
Paul, Landy, Beiley & Harper and Barry D. Hunter, for appellees.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and LEVY and GERSTEN, JJ.
According to the plaintiffs-appellants, which are Venezuelan corporations, their managing agent, Enrique Collazo, unlawfully directed a French bank in Paris to wire transfer $1,400,000 from their corporate account to one controlled by Collazo in a bank in Miami. In the present action, the corporations sued Collazo and, among others, the present appellee Oswaldo Castillo, 1 for damages in the Dade County Circuit Court. On Castillo's motion, the trial court dismissed the action under the doctrine of forum non conveniens. The plaintiffs appeal but we affirm. 2
The doctrine of forum non conveniens, under which an action which is technically maintainable in the existing forum may be dismissed if it more appropriately should be maintained elsewhere, applies only when all of the parties are citizens of, and the cause of action accrued in another jurisdiction. See Mitsubishi Elec. Sales Am., Inc. v. Refriaire Int'l Corp., N.V., 538 So.2d 982 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989); see also Seaboard Coast Line R.R. v. Swain, 362 So.2d 17 (Fla.1978); Armadora Naval Dominicana, S.A. v. Garcia, 478 So.2d 873 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). In this case, it is undisputed that the plaintiffs-appellants and the party-defendants, including both Collazo and Castillo, are citizens of Venezuela. The appellants press the contention, however, that the doctrine of forum non conveniens is inapplicable because the various claims contained in the complaint--arising out of the theft and conversion of the corporate bank accounts--accrued in Miami. We hold to the contrary that the plaintiffs' claim arose in Paris, where the defendants wrongfully asserted control over the accounts.
The general rule applicable here is that a tort claim "is deemed to have accrued where the last event necessary to make the defendant liable for the tort took place." Tucker v. Fianson, 484 So.2d 1370, 1371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986), review denied, 494 So.2d 1153 (1986); see E.J. Sales & Service, Inc. v. Southeast First Nat'l Bank of Miami, 415 So.2d 906 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). As to the tort of conversion, that act constitutes the exercise of wrongful dominion and control over the property to the detriment of the rights of its actual owner. See Star Fruit Co. v. Eagle Lake Growers, 160 Fla. 130, 33 So.2d 858 (1948); General Finance Corp. v. Sexton, 155 So.2d 159 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963). In the case of the depleting of a bank account in one jurisdiction and its transmission to another, that wrongful act is necessarily deemed to have taken place where the defendant effects a withdrawal and, to make a long story short, steals the money. It is not, as the appellants would have it, in the place where the funds become accessible to the thieves--which occurred in this case, in Miami. 3 See Star Fruit, 160 Fla. at 132, 33 So.2d at 860 (); see also National Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Caribe Aviation, Inc., 759 F.2d 873, 878 (11th Cir.1985) (); Sexton, 155 So.2d at 161 (). Several Florida cases have applied these rules in indistinguishable situations. Eagle v. Benefield-Chappell, Inc., 476 So.2d 716 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985) ( ); Allen v. Gordon, 429 So.2d 369 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) ( ); Blair v. Davis, 281 So.2d 247 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973) (...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
U.S. v. Bailey
...a person of property to the possession of which he is entitled") (internal citations and quotations omitted); Venezolanos v. Collazo, 559 So.2d 651, 652-53 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1990) (accord); Rice v. Ins. & Bonds, Inc., 366 So.2d 85, 87 n. 2 (Fla. 3rd DCA), cert. dismissed, 372 So.2d 469 (Fla.197......
-
Amersham Enters., Inc. v. Hakim-Daccach
...to have accrued where the last event necessary to make the defendant liable for the tort took place.’ " Envases Venezolanos, S.A. v. Collazo, 559 So. 2d 651, 652 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990) (quoting Tucker v. Fianson, 484 So. 2d 1370, 1371 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986) ). Here, the jurisdictional defendants co......
-
Mendes v. Dowelanco Indus. LTDA.
...are inclined to believe but find it unnecessary directly to determine--the doctrine applies to this case, see Envases Venezolanos, S.A. v. Collazo, 559 So.2d 651 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), it is permissible to do just what the trial court did here: refer the substantive issues to a much more conve......
-
Fattorusso v. Hass, Case No: 2:10-CV-201-FtM-SPC
...courts as "the wrongful deprivation of a person of property to the possession of which he is entitled." Envases Venzolanos, S.A. v. Collazo, 559 So.2d 651, 652-53 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). Thus, before a defendant may be held guilty of conversion, the plaintiff must show the defendant "exercised ......