Estate of Davis, Matter of
| Decision Date | 29 July 1987 |
| Docket Number | No. 57062,57062 |
| Citation | 510 So.2d 798 |
| Parties | In the Matter of the ESTATE OF Mary Belle DAVIS, Deceased. Linda Mattox SIMS and Henry E. Mattox v. Hallie S. STENNIS, Thomas L. Stennis, II, Individually, and Thomas L. Stennis, II, Executor. |
| Court | Mississippi Supreme Court |
Jack B. Weldy, Hattiesburg, for appellants.
W. Raymond Hunter, Bryant, Stennis & Colingo, Gulfport, for appellees.
Before ROY NOBLE LEE, P.J., and DAN M. LEE and GRIFFIN, JJ.
This case, concerning the admission of a will to probate, comes to the Court from the Chancery Court of Kemper County, which dismissed an action, contesting the will, pursuant to M.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6). We affirm.
On September 19, 1969, Mary Belle Davis executed a writing, styled "Last Will and Testament." Likewise, on June 16, 1973 and February 11, 1978, she executed codicils to her will. On November 1, 1982, Davis died at age eighty-eight.
On January 24, 1983, Betty Eldridge, Kemper County Chancery Clerk, admitted the will and codicils to probate, signing the decree,
Edward C. Prisock
Chancellor
By: Betty Eldridge, Clerk.
Thereafter, Eldridge issued Letters Testamentary to Thomas L. Stennis, II. The chancery court was then in vacation.
On June 13, 1983, again in session, Chancellor Prisock entered an order, which stated,
This day came on for hearing by the Court the matter of approving the acts of the clerk in vacation since the last term of this Court, and it appearing that all are correct and legal and no objections and exceptions to the same or any part thereof have been filed:
It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed that all acts done and performed by the Chancery Clerk of Kemper County, Mississippi since the last term of this Court be and the same are hereby ratified, approved and confirmed.
Done in open Court this 13th day of June, 1983.
On May 6, 1985, Linda Mattox Sims, Davis' great-niece, and Henry E. Mattox, Davis' great-nephew, brought suit against Thomas L. Stennis, individually and as the executor, and Hallie S. Stennis, both of whom inherited from Davis through her nephew, Sam Davis Stennis, Thomas' father and Hallie's husband. In this complaint, Sims and Mattox allege that Davis was mentally incompetent when making the will, which resulted from Sam Davis and Thomas Stennis' undue influence.
On August 20, 1985, Chancellor Prisock dismissed the cause of action, pursuant to M.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), finding it barred by Miss.Code Ann. Sec. 91-7-23 (1972), which states,
Any person interested may, at any time within two years, by petition or bill, contest the validity of the will probated without notice; and an issue shall be made up and tried as other issues to determine whether the writing produced be the will of the testator or not. If some person does not appear within two years to contest the will, the probate shall be final and forever binding, saving to infants and persons of unsound mind the period of two years to contest the will after the removal of their respective disabilities. In case of concealed fraud, the limitation shall commence to run at, and not before, the time when such fraud shall be, or with reasonable diligence might have been, first known or discovered. (emphasis added)
Appellants argue that when the chancery clerk signed the chancellor's name to the decree, it was void. In short, they maintain that the chancery clerk engaged in a judicial, not ministerial, act. Therefore, the will was not probated, and the statute of limitations did not run. The chancellor then was unable to ratify, later, an act which previously was null and void.
In fact, the chancery clerk was acting in accordance with constitutional and legislative provisions, when she admitted the will to probate. Miss. Const. Art. 6, Sec. 168 states that the "Legislature shall provide by law what duties shall be performed during vacation by clerks of the circuit and chancery courts, subject to approval of the court." Miss.Code Ann. Sec. 9-5-141 (Supp.1986), cataloging these duties, permits the clerk to "take the proof of wills, admit wills to probate, in common form, [and] grant letters testamentary...." This is consistent with the facts of this case.
Also, Miss.Code Ann. Sec. 9-5-151 (Supp.1986), reads,
The minutes so kept of proceedings in vacation or in term time shall constitute a record of the office and shall be carefully preserved as such, free from erasure or alteration; and, at the first term thereafter of the court, in the case of minutes in vacation, or in the case of minutes in term...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Nunnery v. Nunnery
...Matter of Last Will and Testament of Winding v. Estate of Winding, 783 So.2d 707, 711 (¶ 15) (Miss.2001) (citing In re Estate of Davis, 510 So.2d 798, 800 (Miss.1987) ).¶ 18. We again note the equitable nature of an excusable neglect determination, and we will not fault the chancellor for c......
-
Boyd v. Smith (In re Will)
...will to probate ...." Fields v. Harris (In re Will of Fields) , 570 So. 2d 1202, 1204 (Miss. 1990) (citing Sims v. Stennis (In re Estate of Davis) , 510 So. 2d 798, 799 (Miss. 1987) ).3 This case law should resolve the statute of limitations question in this case because it recognizes that ......
-
Cox v. Cox
...be vigilant." See Last Will and Testament of Winding v. Estate of Winding, 783 So.2d 707, 711 (Miss.2001) (citing In re Estate of Davis, 510 So.2d 798, 800 (Miss.1987)). ¶ 31. We agree that Jennings must bear some responsibility for an almost nine-year period in which no substantive action ......
-
Will of Fields, In re
...to the act of the clerk accepting the will for probate which, in this instance, occurred on September 28, 1983. In re Estate of Davis, 510 So.2d 798, 800 (Miss.1987); Rush v. Rush, 360 So.2d 1240, 1243 (Miss.1978); In re Estate of Stanback, 222 So.2d 660, 663 (Miss.1969); Perry v. Aldrich, ......