Eubanks v. Eubanks
| Decision Date | 06 March 1968 |
| Docket Number | No. 531,531 |
| Parties | Harold Gene EUBANKS, Plaintiff, v. Brenda Walker EUBANKS and Bonnie C. Walker, Guardian Ad Litem of Brenda WalkerEubanks, Defendants. |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Plaintiff's appeal,
New trial.
Defendant's appeal,
Reversed and remanded.
LAKE and HUSKINS, JJ., took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
To continue reading
Request your trial
60 cases
-
Williams v. Williams
...§ 52-10.1, "parties to a divorce may enter into [an] agreement to settle the question of alimony ..."), and Eubanks v. Eubanks, 273 N.C. 189, 195, 159 S.E.2d 562, 567 (1968) (G.S. § 52-10, " 'relates to the release of an interest in property, but has no bearing whatsoever on the right of a ......
-
Newman v. Newman, s. 80SC169
...relationship to one another. In Re Estate of Lopata, supra; Kosik v. George, 253 Or. 15, 452 P.2d 560 (1969); Eubanks v. Eubanks, 273 N.C. 189, 159 S.E.2d 562, 567 (1968). They, therefore, must act in good faith, with a high degree of fairness and disclosure of all circumstances which mater......
-
In re C.H.M.
...respondent should have recognized the pressing need to protect his paternal interest and acted accordingly. See Eubanks v. Eubanks , 273 N.C. 189, 197, 159 S.E.2d 562, 568 (1968) ("When a child is born in wedlock, the law presumes it to be legitimate.").Respondent's evidence here failed to ......
-
Leatherman v. Leatherman
...most confidential of all relationships, and transactions between them, to be valid, must be fair and reasonable." Eubanks v. Eubanks, 273 N.C. 189, 159 S.E.2d 562 (1968); See also: Link v. Link, 278 N.C. 181, 179 S.E.2d 697 (1971); Vail v. Vail,233 N.C. 109, 63 S.E.2d 202 (1951). Where such......
Request a trial to view additional results