Evans v. Bd. of Educ. of Gloucester City, 24.
Decision Date | 14 May 1936 |
Docket Number | No. 24.,24. |
Parties | Henry M. EVANS, Prosecutor-Appellant v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF GLOUCESTER CITY and State Board of Education, Defendants-Respondents. |
Court | New Jersey Supreme Court |
Appeal from Supreme Court.
Henry M. Evans, of Camden (Alfred Brenner, of Bayonne, of counsel), for appellant.
Firmin Michel, of Camden, for respondents.
An affirmance of the judgment of the Supreme Court is called for and for the reason set forth in the opinion of that court (179 A. 475, 13 N.J.Misc. 506) that the "prosecutor's term of office was either fixed by the resolution creating the office at one year, or, if not so fixed, in the absence of statute, presently in force, or ordinance or rule under legislative sanction, the term was for one year being coterminous with that of the appointing power."
We agree with the Supreme Court that "it is not material to the determination of this case that the solicitor of a board of education be regarded as an officer."
The judgment under review is affirmed, with costs.
For affirmance: The CHANCELLOR, The CHIEF JUSTICE, Justices LLOYD, DONGES, HEHER, and PERSKIE, and Judges HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, and RAFFERTY—11.
For reversal: None.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Talty v. Board of Educ. of School Dist. of City of Hoboken
...of the appointing body. Evans v. Board of Education of Gloucester City, 179 A. 475, 13 N.J.Misc. 506 (Sup.Ct.1935), affirmed 116 N.J.L. 448, 184 A. 813 (E. & A.1936). The Evans case denied an honorably discharged veteran, the solicitor for a local board of education appointed without term, ......
-
Fox v. Bd. of Educ. of Newark in Essex County
...affirmed 115 N.J.L. 203, 178 A. 793, and Evans v. Board of Education of Gloucester City, 179 A. 475, 13 N.J.Misc. 506, affirmed 116 N.J.L. 448, 184 A. 813. These cases stand for the proposition that Boards of Education are not continuous bodies, and that the term of office of one employed b......
-
Talty v. Board of Educ. of School Dist. of City of Hoboken, L--951
...the appointing power. Evans v. Board of Education of Gloucester City, 179 A. 475, 13 N.J.Misc. 506 (Sup.Ct.1935), affirmed 116 N.J.L. 448 184 A. 813 (E. & A.1936). If the rulings in the above decisions were controlling at present, it is clear that plaintiff's appointment would be construed ......
- Robinson v. Jackson