Ex parte Paramount Coal Co.

• Decision Date: 28 May 1925
• Docket Number: 6 Div. 336
• Citation: Ex parte Paramount Coal Co., 104 So. 753, 213 Ala. 281 (Ala. 1925)
• Parties: Ex parte PARAMOUNT COAL CO. v. PARAMOUNT COAL CO. WILLIAMS
• Court: Alabama Supreme Court

104 So. 753

213 Ala. 281

Ex parte PARAMOUNT COAL CO.

WILLIAMS v. PARAMOUNT COAL CO.

6 Div. 336

Supreme Court of Alabama

May 28, 1925

Certiorari to Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Roger W. Snyder, Judge.

Petition of the Paramount Coal Company for certiorari to the circuit court of Jefferson county to review the judgment and finding of that court in a proceeding under the Workmen's Compensation Act by Tom Williams against petitioner.Writ denied.

B.F. Smith and A.M. Boone, both of Birmingham, for appellant.

W.A. Denson, of Birmingham, for appellee.

THOMAS, J.

The findings of fact being too meager to fully inform this court in respect to the previous weekly earnings of Tom Williams, the bill of exceptions is considered.Ex parte Mt. Carmel Coal Co., 209 Ala. 519, 96 So. 626.In Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford,206 Ala. 447, 90 So. 803, Ex parte H.T. Smith Lumber Co., 206 Ala. 485, 90 So. 807, andEx parte Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. (Greek's Case), 207 Ala. 219, 92 So. 458, it was declared of adjudications under the Workmen's Compensation Act(Laws 1919, p. 206) that, where there is "any legal evidence to support the finding, such finding is conclusive, and no technical questions as to the admissibility of evidence will be here considered."At the trial the evidence of the wife and Mr. Donaldson was before the court, and there was evidence on the part of the former to support the judgment rendered.

The costs were awarded within the terms of the statute.Gen.Acts 1919, p. 228.

The writ is denied.

ANDERSON, C.J., and SOMERVILLE and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.