Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Reed
Citation | 137 So. 673,223 Ala. 617 |
Decision Date | 19 November 1931 |
Docket Number | 6 Div. 956. |
Court | Supreme Court of Alabama |
Parties | REPUBLIC IRON & STEEL CO. v. REED. |
Certiorari to Circuit Court, Jefferson County; Roger Snyder, Judge.
Proceeding under the Workmen's Compensation Act by Gertrude Reed against the Republic Iron & Steel Company, to recover compensation as dependent widow of Tom Reed. Judgment awarding compensation, and the employer brings certiorari.
Affirmed.
Benners Burr, McKamy & Forman, of Birmingham, for appellant.
W. A Denson, of Birmingham, for appellee.
It is well settled that the findings of fact by the court in compensation cases are conclusive, if there is any legal evidence to support them. Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. v House, 217 Ala. 422, 116 So. 167; Ex parte Coleman, 211 Ala. 248, 100 So. 114; Wilson v. Birmingham Electric Co., 219 Ala. 436, 122 So. 411; Dean v. Stockham Pipe & Fittings Co., 220 Ala. 25, 123 So. 225; Morgan-Hill Paving Co. v. Stewart, 220 Ala. 480, 126 So. 116.
It is also said in the case first above cited that technical questions as to the admissibility of evidence will not be considered on appeal. However, the general rules of evidence pertain to such cases as are ordinarily applicable to other proceedings in court. 1 Honold Workmen's Compensation, § 126.
The subject of the admissibility of declarations made by decedent in compensation cases, especially those declarations which tend to show the existence of his claim, has been treated in numerous cases in this country, and in England. They generally hold that such declarations are not legal evidence, unless otherwise controlled by statute. Valentine v. Weaver, 191 Ky. 37, 228 S.W. 1036; McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co., 261 Pa. 312, 104 A. 617; Reck v. Whittlesberger, 181 Mich. 463, 148 N.W. 247, Ann. Cas. 1916C, 771, note 775 et seq.; Kivish v. Industrial Commission, 312 Ill. 311, 143 N.E. 860; Chicago, etc., R. Co. v. Industrial Board, 274 Ill. 336, 113 N.E. 629; Morris & Co. v. Industrial Board, 284 Ill. 67, 119 N.E. 944, L. R. A. 1918E, 919.
There was error in permitting evidence of declarations by deceased that he was injured by a pick while he was engaged in his employment. But such error does not have the effect of reversing the case, if there is legal evidence of the facts as found by the court independent of that which is illegal. Sloss-Sheffield S. & I. Co. v. House, supra; Ex parte Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co., 207 Ala. 219, 92 So. 458; Valentine v. Weaver, supra; McCauley v. Imperial Woolen Co., supra; Reck v. Whittlesberger, supra.
Some of those cases are where such legal evidence is circumstantial, from which an inference may be reasonably drawn of the existence of the essential ultimate facts.
We have also held that, if the injury works upon a disease germ already existent in the deceased when the accident occurs, so that it stimulates such latent disease into activity, which causes the death of the workman, it resulted from the accident and is compensable. Goslin-Birmingham Mfg. Co. v. Gantt, 222 Ala. 321, 131 So. 905.
Petitioner testified:
John Beasley testified that he saw him coming from his work on the last day he worked, about halfway between the bathhouse and the mouth of the mine; that he was limping and had on his overalls. His overalls were introduced in evidence; they showed a hole in the leg.
There was other evidence of the abrasion on his leg. His "buddies" working with him in the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Alabama By-Products Co. v. Landgraff
... ... Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Keefe, 217 Ala. 409, ... 116 So. 424; Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Reed, 223 Ala ... 617, 137 So. 673; Ford v. Crystal Laundry Co., 238 ... ...
-
Malbis Bakery Co. v. Collins
... ... disturbed. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Alexander, ... 241 Ala. 476, 3 So.2d 46; Hayes v. Alabama ... Majors v. Jackson Lumber Co., Ala.Sup., 13 So.2d ... 885; Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Reed, 223 Ala. 617, 137 ... So. 673; Sloss-Sheffield ... ...
-
W.P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. Crossley
... ... Smith Lumber Co., 206 Ala ... 485, 90 So. 807; Martin v. Republic Steel Co., 226 ... Ala. 209, 146 So. 276. The facts of that case are in ... those in Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co. v. Crim, ... 219 Ala. 148, 121 So. 408; Stith Coal Co. v. Alvis, ... v ... Bradford, supra; Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Reed, ... 223 Ala. 617, 137 So. 673 ... We ... think the finding ... ...
-
Pow v. Southern Const. Co., Inc.
... ... Notable ... among these is Gulf States Steel Co. v. Christison, ... 228 Ala. 622, 154 So. 565, 569 ... That ... Thus, ... in Jones v. Philadelphia Coal & Iron Co., 285 Pa ... 317, 132 A. 122, 123, a pneumonia case, with symptoms ... Pacific Tea Co. v. Davis, 226 Ala. 626, 148 So. 309; ... Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Reed, 223 Ala. 617, 137 ... We ... would ... ...