Farmers Elevator Co. of Sterling v. First Nat. Bank of Fleming, 24407
Decision Date | 12 October 1971 |
Docket Number | No. 24407,24407 |
Parties | FARMERS ELEVATOR COMPANY OF STERLING, a Colorado corporation, et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. The FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FLEMING, a National Banking Corporation, et al., Defendants in Error. |
Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Francis A. Benedetti, Wray, for plaintiffs in error.
Sandhouse & Sandhouse, Charles H. Sandhouse, Sterling, for defendants in error.
The parties appear herein in the same order as in the lower court. This case is one of several in the District Court of Logan County. We have already had occasion to review one of the actions in Farmers Elevator Company of Sterling v. Morgan, 172 Colo. 545, 474 P.2d 617 (1970), which will be referred to in this opinion as case #11295, which was the civil action number assigned to it in district court. In that case we reversed the judgment of the lower court dismissing the action as to all defendants, holding that the instrument designated as Exhibit A, which was conditioned upon the dismissal of First National Bank of Fleming and one Myron Karsten in suit #11295, did not serve to release the remaining defendants. The cause was remanded for trial as to all the other defendants.
While #11295 was pending in this court on writ of error and before our opinion was announced in that case, plaintiffs sought declaratory relief, asking that the lower court make 'a judicial declaration of their rights, status and legal relationship to the Defendants by virtue of a certain Agreement * * *.' Plaintiffs asked that the court determine that the above agreement act as a settlement in various pending actions, not, however, including #11295. It was the position of the plaintiffs that the agreement had no application to #11295. In the alternative, plaintiffs' initial complaint asked that the agreement be declared 'null and void.' Subsequently, the plaintiffs filed what was designated as a 'reply pleading' in which they attempted to alter or amend their alternative ground for relief and plead instead that the agreement be declared null and void only as to #11295. Defendants filed an intervening answer in which they admitted that the agreement was based upon a mutual mistake of fact and that the agreement should be declared invalid.
The lower court denied the plaintiffs' attempt to amend the alternative ground for relief and then conducted a hearing, at the conclusion of which it held, in part, as follows:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mt. Emmons Min. Co. v. Town of Crested Butte
...440, 447 (Colo.1983); Theobald v. Board of County Commissioners, 644 P.2d 942 (Colo.1982); see e.g., Farmers Elevator Co. v. First National Bank, 176 Colo. 168, 489 P.2d 318 (1971); People ex rel. Inter-Church Temperance Movement v. Baker, 133 Colo. 398, 297 P.2d 273 (1956). 11 Thus, while ......
-
Community Tele-Communications, Inc. v. Heather Corp.
... ... has first been obtained" from the city ... Commissioners, 657 P.2d 440 (Colo.1983); Farmers Elevator Co. v. First National Bank, 176 Colo ... ...
-
Three Bells Ranch Associates v. Cache La Poudre Water Users Ass'n
...controversy exists. Beacom v. Board of County Comm'rs, 657 P.2d 440, 447 (Colo.1983); Farmers Elevator Co. of Sterling v. First Nat'l Bank of Fleming, 176 Colo. 168, 171, 489 P.2d 318, 319 (1971). The legal controversy presented must be a current one rather than one that may arise at some f......
-
Beacom In and For Seventeenth Judicial Dist., Adams County v. Board of County Com'rs of Adams County
...judgment must be based upon an actual controversy and not be merely a request for an advisory opinion. Farmers Elevator Company v. First National Bank, 176 Colo. 168, 489 P.2d 318 (1971); Heron v. City and County of Denver, 159 Colo. 314, 411 P.2d 314 (1966) 13; Ahern v. Baker, 148 Colo. 40......