Feldman v. Feldman

Decision Date06 January 1953
Docket NumberNo. 674,674
Citation73 S.E.2d 865,236 N.C. 731
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesFELDMAN, v. FELDMAN.

Hayes, Hatfield & McClain, WinstonSalem, for plaintiff_appellee.

Jordan & Wright and Perry C. Henson, Greensboro, for defendant-appellant.

BARNHILL, Justice.

Allowance of alimony payable after a decree of divorce a vinculo was unknown to the common law. Duffy v. Duffy, 120 N.C. 346, 27 S.E. 28; Lockman v. Lockman, 220 N.C. 95, 16 S.E.2d 670; Gavit Black Com., pp. 188, 189.

'At common law, where a divorce a vinculo matrimonii was granted, no allowance for the future support of the wife was given, and we have no statute in this state allowing it.' Duffy v. Duffy, supra; Crews v. Crews, 175 N.C. 168, 95 S.E. 149; Hobbs v. Hobbs, 218 N.C. 468, 11 S.E.2d 311; Stanley v. Stanley, 226 N.C. 129, 37 S.E.2d 118; Annotation 166 A.L.R. 1004.

As the right did not exist at common law, the right of the wife to support after divorce a vinculo is subject to legislative regulation. Only such rights to alimony exist as are provided by statute, Cooke v. Cooke, 164 N.C. 272, 80 S.E. 178, 49 L.R.A.,N.S., 1034, and the General Assembly of North Carolina, except as hereinafter noted, has never enacted any statute permitting the granting of alimony after the dissolution of the bonds of matrimony. Since the decree dissolves the status, it terminates all the incidents of marriage, including the right of the wife to support and maintenance.

This principle was first put into ststutory form by the General Assembly of this State in 1871. Ch. 193, sec. 43, of the Public Laws of 1871-72 provides that 'After a judgment of divorce from the bonds of matrimony, all rights arising out of the marriage shall cease and determine, and either party may marry again: Provided * * *' (Proviso relates to children). This statute has been enacted and re-enacted in every succeeding codification of our law and is now G.S. § 50-11.

The only modification thereof in respect to alimony is contained in ch. 204, P.L. 1919. Section 1 thereof is as follows:

'Section 1. That in all cases where an absolute divorce is granted upon the grounds of separation of husband and wife for ten (now two) successive years as provided by law, such decree granting such divorce shall not have the effect of impairing or destroying the right of the wife to receive alimony under any judgment or decree of the court rendered before the commencement of such proceeding for absolute divorce.'

This section of that act, as amended, is brought forward as a proviso in G.S. § 50-11.

It is not contended that the consent order was entered prior to the institution of this action. Instead, the record discloses and it is conceded that it was entered on defendant's cross action filed in this cause. Hence it is without statutory authorization insofar as it requires plaintiff to pay alimony after the entry of the final decree of divorce.

It is true that when the order was signed the court had jurisdiction of the parties and of the subject matter of the action. Even so, he had no jurisdiction to enter an order requiring plaintiff to...

To continue reading

Request your trial
25 cases
  • M.E. v. T.J.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • December 31, 2020
    ...is not invoked sua sponte, and is "never dependent upon the conduct of the parties" or inaction by the Court. Feldman v. Feldman , 236 N.C. 731, 734, 73 S.E.2d 865, 867 (1953).B. Effect of DismissalWhen Plaintiff signed and filed her voluntary dismissal of the N.C. Gen. Stat. § 50B-1(b)(6) ......
  • In re T.R.P.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • November 17, 2006
    ..."Jurisdiction rests upon the law and the law alone. It is never dependent upon the conduct of the parties." Feldman v. Feldman, 236 N.C. 731, 734, 73 S.E.2d 865, 867 (1953). Subject matter jurisdiction "`cannot be conferred upon a court by consent, waiver or estoppel, and therefore failure ......
  • Cunningham v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • May 6, 2022
    ...upon the conduct of the parties." In re T.R.P. , 360 N.C. 588, 595, 636 S.E.2d 787, 793 (2006) (quoting Feldman v. Feldman , 236 N.C. 731, 734, 73 S.E.2d 865, 867 (1953) ). The Industrial Commission's jurisdiction "is limited and conferred by statute." Pearson v. C.P. Buckner Steel Erection......
  • Blevins v. Town of West Jefferson
    • United States
    • North Carolina Court of Appeals
    • April 17, 2007
    .... . . [j]urisdiction rests upon the law and the law alone. It is never dependent on the conduct of the parties." Feldman v. Feldman, 236 N.C. 731, 734, 73 S.E.2d 865, 867 (1953). "The appellant has the burden to see that all necessary papers are before the appellate court." Crowell Construc......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT