Ferguson v. State
Decision Date | 19 October 1964 |
Citation | 220 Ga. 364,138 S.E.2d 881 |
Parties | Billy FERGUSON v. The STATE. No 22607. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
A. Hugh Leatherwood, Douglasville, for plaintiff in error.
Dan Winn, Sol. Gen., Cedartown, John T. Perrin, Asst. Sol. Gen., Dallas, Robert J. Noland, Douglasville, Eugene Cook, Atty. Gen., Rubye G. Jackson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanata, for defendant in error.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
Billy Ferguson, convicted of murdering Luke A. Brown with a certain pistol, filed an extraordinary motion for new trial alleging the discovery of material evidence subsequent to the trial. The evidence that was the basis of the motion was the testimony of one Harold M. Adams that between 8 and 8:30 on the morning of the homicide, some thirty minutes after the same was committed, he visited the scene of the tragedy, the deceased's repair shop, and saw a pistol lying about a foot or two from and on the west side of the deceased's body. The witness did not identify the pistol further than to describe it as a revolver.
On the hearing of the motion the State made a counter showing. The testimony of Vincent Henderson, an undertaker, Edward Brown, a cousin of the deceased, and James Rainwater, a deputy sheriff, sworn on behalf of the State, was that they were at the scene of the homicide prior to and at the time the witness Adams was there; that they carefully looked around the body and even raised it up and looked under it in search of a pistol and that there was none close to the body or near the place where it was during the time they were present before the witness Adams arrived or at the time he testified he was present. There were other witnesses who testified they were present and did not see a pistol either before or at the time referred to in Adams' testimony.
The record of the trial that resulted in the movant's conviction was admitted in evidence. It contained a written confession of the movant: The State also introduced a letter written by the defendant subsequent to his conviction. It was...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Ferguson v. Caldwell
...hearing, denied the motion on April 17, 1964. On appeal, the denial was affirmed by the Supreme Court of Georgia. Ferguson v. State, 220 Ga. 364, 138 S.E.2d 881 (1964). The Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari. Ferguson v. Georgia, 381 U.S. 905, 85 S.Ct. 1451, 14 L.Ed.2d 286......
-
Ferguson v. Balkcom
...for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence. His motion was overruled and that judgment was affirmed in Ferguson v. State, 220 Ga. 364, 138 S.E.2d 881, certiorari denied 381 U.S. 905, 85 S.Ct. 1451, 14 L.Ed.2d 286. We do not deem it necessary to point out specifically the rulin......
-
Simmons v. State
...and the credit to be given his testimony is for the trier of the facts, the judge here, to determine. Code § 38-1806; Ferguson v. State, 220 Ga. 364(2), 138 S.E.2d 881; Haywood v. State, 114 Ga. 111(1), 39 S.E. Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur. ...
-
Becton v. State, 61774
...in his place that he had made no representation of leniency to Baker. No manifest abuse of discretion was shown. Ferguson v. State, 220 Ga. 364, 138 S.E.2d 881 (1964). Stroud v. State, 247 Ga. 395, 276 S.E.2d 597 (1981). Accordingly, the trial court did not err in denying appellant's motion......