Fernandez v. Wright, 2D12–849.
Decision Date | 10 April 2013 |
Docket Number | No. 2D12–849.,2D12–849. |
Citation | 111 So.3d 229 |
Parties | Marisol S. FERNANDEZ, Appellant, v. Lewis C. WRIGHT, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Marisol S. Fernandez, pro se.
Norman A. Palumbo, Jr., Tampa, for Appellee.
Marisol Fernandez, the Mother, appeals an order entered in the circuit court's family law division involving Lewis Wright, the Father of the parties' minor child. The order was entered after a hearing on the Mother's supplemental petition for the modification of child support and the Father's motion seeking additional time-sharing, attorney's fees, and enforcement of a previous court order. We reverse that part of the order which permanently modifies one aspect of the parenting plan and remand for the trial court to note that this change is temporary. We also reverse that part of the order awarding the Father $4811.94 for attorney's fees incurred in litigating domestic violence injunction cases. The remaining aspects of the order are affirmed.
On August 19, 2011, the parties filed a parenting plan and settlement agreement which provided that during the Father's time-sharing week, the Mother was allowed to select three school-day afternoons to pick up the child from school and return the child to the Father by 6:30 p.m.1 In the order on appeal, the circuit court found that the Mother had refused to comply with the parties' time-sharing agreement and had wrongfully kept the child from the Father from December 16, 2011, through the date of the order, January 26, 2012. To allow the Father to recover this time that he had missed with the child, the trial court announced at the hearing that during the Father's week with the child, the Mother's right to pick up the child from school and keep the child with her until 6:30 p.m. would be suspended until the Father's missed time with the child was recovered. However, the order reflects that this change is permanent. It states that Because this portion of the written order is materially different from the trial court's oral pronouncement, this part of the order must be reversed. See Leonard v. Leonard, 613 So.2d 1339, 1340 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); Meyer v. Meyer, 525 So.2d 462, 464 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). On remand, the trial court should clarify in the order that this change in the custody arrangement is temporary.
The trial court also ordered that the Mother reimburse the Father for attorney's fees in the amount of $6610.50, even though this amount included $4811.94 for fees incurred in three domestic violence cases that were not a part of this family law case. This was improper. The statute creating a cause of action for an injunction for protection against domestic violence, § 741.30, Fla. Stat. (2011), does not provide for an award of attorney's fees. See Baumgartner v. Baumgartner, 693 So.2d 84, 85 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997) ( ). In an appeal of a final judgment of dissolution of marriage, this court has specifically held that “[a]ttorney's fees cannot be awarded for services rendered by counsel in a separately filed domestic violence injunction case.” Belmont v. Belmont, 761 So.2d 406, 407 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). Therefore, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hall v. Lopez
...a matter, however, that should be dealt with by the Legislature rather than the courts." Id. at 1274 ; see also Fernandez v. Wright, 111 So.3d 229, 230–31 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013) (finding that the trial court abused its discretion in awarding attorney's fees to the appellee for work related to t......
- Ward v. State
-
Family law proceedings and grounds
...a Chapter 61 action provides for attorneys’ fees, the laws governing domestic violence action do not. Similarly, in Fernandez v. Wright, 111 So. 3d 229 (Fla. 2d DCA 2013), the Second DCA reversed the trial court’s award of husband’s attorneys’ fees under section 741.30, Florida Statutes; th......