First Federal Sav. Bank of Georgia v. Eaglewood Court Condominium Ass'n, Inc., 75753
| Citation | 367 S.E.2d 876,186 Ga.App. 605 |
| Decision Date | 18 March 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 75753,75753 |
| Parties | . Court of Appeals of Georgia |
| Court | United States Court of Appeals (Georgia) |
John P. Joiner, Winder, for appellant.
John J. Barrow, Athens, for appellee.
Appellant-defendant First Federal Savings Bank of Georgia (First Federal) made loans to Richard Burnette, who used the funds to buy condominium units in the Eaglewood Court development. First Federal held purchase money security deeds for each of Burnette's units. Burnette subsequently defaulted on his loans from First Federal and on the condominium association assessments which he was obligated to pay to appellee-plaintiff Eaglewood Court Condominium Association, Inc. (Eaglewood). First Federal foreclosed on the property by exercising its power of sale as contained in the security deeds. After First Federal had assumed ownership of the units, Eaglewood sought payment from First Federal of a pro rata share of the defaulted assessments. See OCGA § 44-3-80(f). First Federal refused to pay and Eaglewood brought this suit against First Federal. Eaglewood not only sought a recovery of a pro rata share of the defaulted assessments, but also sought a recovery as to such various penalties for late payment and attorney's fees as were provided for in the Declaration of Condominium (Declaration). See OCGA § 44-3-109(a) and (b). In all, Eaglewood sought an amount of not less than $4,880.17. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment. The trial court ordered First Federal to pay $4,168.91, having found that sum to represent the principal amount of assessments, delinquency charges, interest, attorney's fees, and expenses of litigation allocable to First Federal. First Federal appeals.
It is clear that Eaglewood is authorized to maintain this civil action against First Federal for the recovery of such sums as are allegedly due to it as unpaid assessments. Not only is there no proscription as to Eaglewood's maintenance of such a civil action, OCGA § 44-3-76 specifically empowers Eaglewood to maintain "an action to recover sums due...." Accordingly, the only issue to be resolved is whether the trial court correctly held that, under the evidence of record, Eaglewood was authorized to recover $4,168.91 as the sum which was due from First Federal.
OCGA § 44-3-80 specifically provides that First Federal, as the foreclosing first mortgagee, "shall not be liable for nor shall the condominium unit be subject to a lien for any assessment under this Code section or under any condominium instrument chargeable to the condominium unit on account of any period prior to the acquisition of title...." OCGA § 44-3-80(f). Having unqualifiedly provided that a foreclosing mortgagee shall not be liable for nor shall the condominium unit be subject to a lien "for any assessment," the statute then provides that "the unpaid share of an assessment or assessments shall be deemed to be common expenses collectable from all of the unit owners, including such holder or other person and [its] successors, successors-in-title, and assigns." (Emphasis supplied.) OCGA § 44-3-80(f). Thus, while First Federal is clearly not liable nor is its property interest subject to a lien for any assessment, it is obligated to pay a pro rata amount of that "unpaid share " which becomes a part of the common expenses.
The $4,168.91 judgment that was entered against First Federal does not represent merely a pro rata share of the unpaid assessments. That judgment also included a pro rata share of late charges, interest, attorney's fees, expenses of litigation and fair rental value of the units in question. However, the only basis for recovery by Eaglewood of the additional expenses above enumerated would be as a result of the lien established pursuant to the provisions of OCGA § 44-3-109(a). Subsection (b) of OCGA § 44-3-109 provides that "[t]o the extent that the condominium instruments provide, the lien for assessments shall also include" the late charge, interest, litigation expenses, and the fair rental value. However, since OCGA § 44-3-80(f) specifically provides that no lien shall...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Swan Creek Village Homeowners v. Warne
...what the law does not allow to be done directly." Id. at 773 (citation omitted); see also First Fed. Sav. Bank v. Eaglewood Court Condo. Ass'n, 186 Ga.App. 605, 367 S.E.2d 876, 877 (1988) (holding that mortgagee which foreclosed condominium unit was not liable for an unpaid assessment but r......
-
Adams v. State
......599. ADAMS. v. The STATE. No. 75609. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 18, 1988. Rehearing ... process and this case involves only the first step, which is whether appellant met his burden ... the trial court's memory that there was a federal case holding that the presence of any blacks on ......
-
American Holidays, Inc. v. Foxtail Owners Ass'n
...priority. See e.g., Towne Realty, Inc. v. Edwards, 156 Wis.2d 344, 456 N.W.2d 651 (1990); First Federal Savings Bank v. Eaglewood Court Condominium Ass'n, Inc., 186 Ga.App. 605, 367 S.E.2d 876 (1988); Brask v. Bank of St. Louis, 533 S.W.2d 223 (Mo.Ct.App.1975). Wyoming has no such statute, ......
-
Kingsmill Village Condominium Ass'n, Inc. v. Homebanc Federal Sav. Bank
...v. Yorkshire Condo. Assn., 201 Ga.App. 185, 410 S.E.2d 455 is distinguishable from this case. In First Fed. Sav. etc. v. Eaglewood Court Condo. Assn., 186 Ga.App. 605, 606, 367 S.E.2d 876, we held OCGA § 44-3-80(f) "unqualifiedly provide[s] that a foreclosing mortgagee shall not be liable f......