First Merit Credit Servs. v. Fairway Aviation, LLC
Decision Date | 16 June 2021 |
Docket Number | A21A0847 |
Citation | 860 S.E.2d 126,359 Ga.App. 829 |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Parties | FIRST MERIT CREDIT SERVICES v. FAIRWAY AVIATION, LLC et al. |
Richard McBride Howe, Alpharetta, Jeffrey R. Nickerson, Atlanta, for Appellant.
John R. Grimes, Atlanta, Fairway Aviation, LLC, Matthew C. Gilley, Patrick Gilley, for Appellee.
First Merit Credit Services appeals the trial court's order denying its petition for scire facias to revive a dormant foreign judgment on the ground that the petition was time-barred. According to First Merit, the trial court failed to consider an entry on the general execution docket that it alleges restarted the applicable limitations period. First Merit also contends that the limitations period was tolled for 122 days based on the emergency order issued by the Chief Justice of the Georgia Supreme Court in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the extensions of that order. For the reasons discussed below, we vacate the trial court's order and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The relevant facts are undisputed. On December 14, 2009, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio entered judgment in favor of First Merit and against Fairway Aviation, LLC, Matthew C. Gilley, Patrick Clay Gilley, and Paschal Gilley, Jr. (collectively, the "defendants") in the principal amount of $1,276,657.86 (the "Ohio Judgment"). First Merit subsequently filed a petition in the Superior Court of Fayette County to domesticate the Ohio Judgment under the Uniform Enforcement of Foreign Judgments Law ("UEFJL"), OCGA § 9-12-130 et seq., and the trial court granted the petition and domesticated the judgment on August 13, 2010. The trial court directed the clerk of court to issue a writ of fieri facias, which the clerk issued. The writ of fieri facias was recorded on the Fayette County general execution docket on October 18, 2010.
On October 23, 2020, First Merit filed a petition for scire facias to revive the Ohio Judgment in the Superior Court of Fayette County.1 Five days later, on October 28, 2020, the trial court denied the petition. In its order, the trial court concluded that the petition was time-barred under OCGA §§ 9-12-60 and 9-12-61 because the limitations period for enforcing the Ohio Judgment expired on December 14, 2019, ten years after the foreign judgment was rendered. This appeal by First Merit followed.
1. As an initial matter, the defendants contend that First Merit's appeal should be dismissed as untimely. Although the defendants did not file a separate motion to dismiss the appeal as required by our rules,2 "[i]f this Court finds that it has no jurisdiction over an appeal, it has the authority to dismiss the appeal on its own motion." Trey Inman & Assoc. v. Bank of America, N. A. , 306 Ga. App. 451, 455 (1), 702 S.E.2d 711, 715 (2010).
In general, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after entry of the judgment sought to be appealed. OCGA § 5-6-38 (a) ; Adams v. State , 234 Ga. App. 696, 696 (1), 507 S.E.2d 538 (1998). (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Harned v. Piedmont Healthcare Foundation , 356 Ga. App. 870, 871-872, 849 S.E.2d 726 (2020).
First Merit filed its notice of appeal on November 24, 2020, within 30 days of entry of the trial court's order denying its scire facias petition. However, the defendants contend that the notice was void and fatally defective because it listed the wrong superior court case number. We disagree.
OCGA § 5-6-48 (f). Moreover, if a notice of appeal contains an incorrect case number, where "the proper record and transcript have been transmitted to us, indicating that the problem was corrected in the lower court," we will not dismiss the appeal. Gordon v. Weldon , 154 Ga. App. 531, 532 (1), 268 S.E.2d 796 (1980). See State v. Jones , 283 Ga. App. 539, 539, n. 1, 642 S.E.2d 183 (2007).
Although First Merit's notice of appeal specified the wrong superior court case number, the notice included the correct title of the case, accurately recited that the trial court's October 28, 2020 order denying the scire facias petition was the order from which appeal was being sought, and otherwise complied with OCGA § 5-6-37. The proper record also was transmitted to this Court. Furthermore, it is obvious from the notice of appeal, enumeration of error, and underlying record that First Merit sought to appeal the October 28 order. Accordingly, inclusion of the erroneous superior court case number in the notice of appeal clearly was not a fatal defect and did not necessitate dismissal. See OCGA §§ 5-6-30 ; 5-6-48 (f); Jones , 283 Ga. App. at 539, n. 1, 642 S.E.2d 183 ( ); Gordon , 154 Ga. App. at 532 (1), 268 S.E.2d 796 (same).
In any event, First Merit later amended its notice of appeal to correct the erroneous superior court case number. "If an error appears in the notice of appeal, the court shall allow the notice of appeal to be amended at any time prior to judgment to perfect the appeal so that the appellate court can and will pass upon the appeal and not dismiss it." OCGA § 5-6-48 (d). Hence, First Merit's appeal was not subject to dismissal for the additional reason that its notice of appeal was properly amended to cure the defect. See In re Burton , 271 Ga. 491, 492-493 (1), 521 S.E.2d 568 (1999) ( ); Adams v. State , 234 Ga. App. 696, 696 (1), 507 S.E.2d 538 (1998) ( ).
For these reasons, the defendants’ argument that the appeal should be dismissed is without merit.
2. First Merit contends that the trial court erred in denying its petition for scire facias on the ground that enforcement of the Ohio Judgment was time-barred under OCGA §§ 9-12-60 and 9-12-61.
Title 9, Chapter 12, Article 3 of the Georgia Code addresses the dormancy and revival of judgments. More specifically, OCGA § 9-12-60 (a) provides that a judgment becomes dormant and unenforceable:
Entry on the general execution docket in accordance with paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of OCGA § 9-12-60 (a) "shall institute a new seven-year period within which the judgment shall not become dormant." OCGA § 9-12-60 (b).4 See Corzo Trucking Corp. v. West , 296 Ga. App. 399, 401 (1), 674 S.E.2d 414 (2009) ( ). Once a judgment becomes dormant, OCGA § 9-12-61 provides that the judgment "may be renewed or revived by an action or by scire facias, at the option of the holder of the judgment, within three years from the time it becomes dormant."5 OCGA §§ 9-12-60 and 9-12-61 therefore "operate in tandem as a ten-year statute of limitation for the enforcement of Georgia judgments," such that "although a judgment becomes dormant seven years from the date of the last entry upon the execution docket, it does not expire until ten years after that date." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Automotive Credit Corp. v. White , 344 Ga. App. 321, 323, 810 S.E.2d 166 (2018). See Corzo Trucking Corp. v. West , 281 Ga. App. 361, 362-363, 636 S.E.2d 39 (2006).
The fact that this case involves an Ohio judgment, which was later filed in the superior court, does not change our analysis.
Under the UEFJL, "[a]...
To continue reading
Request your trial- Wilson v. Redmond Constr., Inc.
-
Cabinet for Health & Family Servs. v. D.W.
... ... the notice of appeal does not indicate that it was first ... filed into the TPR case as of ... that ... 1967) ... [ 11 ] See also First Merit Credit ... Servs. v. Fairway Aviation, LLC , 860 ... ...
-
Green v. Dep't of Corr.
...Court entered several judicial emergency orders that extended this period by 122 days. See First Merit Credit Services v. Fairway Aviation, LLC , 359 Ga. App. 829, 860 S.E.2d 126 (2021) (discussing the Georgia Supreme Court's judicial emergency orders and their impact on deadlines, includin......
-
Outlaw v. Plantation Pipe Line Co.
...case after issuing its blanket order about COVID procedures. Fourth, contrary to the Outlaws' contention, the Georgia Court of Appeals in First Merit did not hold that the Supreme Court's emergency order tolled any limitations period or discovery period but, rather, remanded to the state tr......