Fitzpatrick v. New York
Decision Date | 19 November 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 73-5370,73-5370 |
Citation | 414 U.S. 1050,94 S.Ct. 554,38 L.Ed.2d 338 |
Parties | Martin J. FITZPATRICK v. State of NEW YORK |
Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
On petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Appeals of New York.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Petitioner Martin Fitzpatrick was convicted for the first-degree murder of two police officers in Sherrill, New York. The police followed reliable leads and located a house owned by Fitzpatrick in Syracuse. After attempting to get a response from inside, the police entered the house through a door which had been left ajar. As they came to a room on the second floor, petitioner called out from a closet in which he was hiding— The officers seized and handcuffed him, and took him out into the hall. The police then questioned Fitzpatrick about the gun he had used, after advising him of his rights. He stated that it was in the closet where he had been found. The gun was retrieved from the closet and it was subsequently identified as the murder weapon at trial.
At a suppression hearing, the trial judge determined that petitioner had not been sufficiently apprised of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and ruled petitioner's oral statements to the police inadmissible. The trial court nevertheless admitted the gun into evidence, rejecting petitioner's contention that it be excluded as fruit of the poisonous tree. Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 83 S.Ct. 407, 9 L.Ed.2d 441 (1963). The trial court adopted what has been termed the rule of 'inevitable discovery,' stating 'proper police investigation would [in any event] have resulted in a search of that closet and [the gun's] discovery.' The New York Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that the search was not inconsistent with Chimel v. California, 395 U.S. 752, 89 S.Ct. 2034, 23 L.Ed.2d 685 (1969), and also adopted the inevitable discovery rule. Chimel held that a search of premises incident to arrest was justified when limited to 'a search of the arrestee's person and the area 'within his immediate control'—construing that phrase to mean the area within which he might gain possession of a weapon or destructible evidence.' Id., at 763, 89 S.Ct. 2034. This limitation lends substance to petitioner's claim that this search, of a closet in a room, while an arrestee is handcuffed in a hall...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Crews v. United States
..., encompasses a hypothetical as well as an actual independent source," Fitzpatrick v. New York, 414 U.S. 1050, 94 S.Ct. 554, 555, 38 L.Ed.2d 338 (1973) (White, J. & Douglas, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari), the Supreme Court has declined the invitation to pass upon the validity of......
-
State v. Ercolano
...42 L.Ed.2d 839 (1975); People v. Fitzpatrick, 32 N.Y.2d 499, 346 N.Y.S.2d 793, 300 N.E.2d 139 (Ct.App.1973), Cert. den. 414 U.S. 1050, 94 S.Ct. 554, 38 L.Ed.2d 338 (1973). But Cf. United States v. Paroutian, 299 F.2d 486 (2 Cir. We need not consider whether the principle stated is a proper ......
-
U.S. v. Lemon
...which the Miranda decision subsequently required could be used in a post-Miranda trial. See also Fitzpatrick v. New York, 414 U.S. 1050, 1051, 94 S.Ct. 554, 38 L.Ed.2d 338 (1973) (White, J., dissenting from denial of 7 Tremayne v. Nelson can also be read as reasoning that, even if the answe......
-
State v. Williams
...the opportunity to consider the rule's constitutionality on several occasions. See, e. g., Fitzpatrick v. New York, 414 U.S. 1050, 1051, 94 S.Ct. 554, 555, 38 L.Ed.2d 338, 339 (1973) (White, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari); Note, The Inevitable Discovery Exception to the Constitut......
-
THE CORROSIVE EFFECT OF INEVITABLE DISCOVERY ON THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.
...note 25, at 91 n.22 (collecting inevitable discovery cases for which the Supreme Court denied certiorari). (32) Fitzpatrick v. New York, 414 U.S. 1050, 1051 (1973) (White & Douglas, JJ., dissenting from denial of certiorari) (citation (33) See Stephen J. Kaczynski, Nix v. Williams and t......